Opinions About the Not So Obvious
02/10/14 Better Hover, click, and touch interaction with link summaries and notes.
See Link Navigation below.Click to go there.
The Truth About SwedenCareLink to The Ludwig von Mises Institute
07/10/13 - Klaus Bernpaintner [edited]
Free healthcare in Sweden was intended only for the poor and supposedly would not affect the practices of existing providers.
When government offered a free alternative, many left their private doctor in favor of the free services. The public system had to be expanded, and private doctors lost patients. Private doctors were forced to take employment within the public system or leave
the profession. The result is a public healthcare monolith.
Are there economies of scale? If so, they are dwarfed by the inefficiencies of the bureaucracy that grew to manage the system.
Very few private practices remain. Most of those are part of the national insurance system. A huge bureaucracy has been erected to take on all the necessary central planning of public and pseudo-private healthcare.
People are already personally paying for their "employer-paid" insurance. They don't buy it directly so (1) it doesn't attach to them when they change jobs, (2) and they can't shop for the insurance they might want.
Healthcare is now tax-free when purchased indirectly as an employment benefit, but mostly taxable through personal insurance or when purchased directly.
Untangle the tax mess, remove employers from the middle, and salaries would go up in the amount of the "free" healthcare benefit through employers. Then people would have enough take-home pay to buy their own health insurance. That is what healthcare reform should be all about.
Most people already pay for their health insurance, but currently have little choice about what they buy. True reform could put that money and choice into their hands.
(M)08/26/12 - AdamSmith.org
If your employer provides to you $6,000 of health care insurance, then you don't get $6,000 of wages. No free lunch.
Government is the ideal director of medicine. Politicians are thoughtful, caring, and altruistic. They devote their lives to helping others.
Contrast this to physicians, who spend half their lives learning diagnosis and complex, delicate procedures, with the intent of charging sick people for these services.
Democrat Timothy Cahill was Massachusett's State Treasurer:
[edited] Implementing the MA health insurance reform nationwide will threaten to wipe out the American economy within four years.
Our experiment has nearly bankrupted MA. Only federal aid is sustaining our law. We’re being propped up so that Obama can drive a similar plan through Congress.
John Cochrane - 11/07/12 [edited]
New regulation will be the big story. ObamaCare and Dodd-Frank (financial) are not specific, but are mostly authorizations such as "the secretary shall write rules governing xyz" with a timetable that starts today. A metastatic expansion of regulation is already mandated and pending.
New EPA regulations will cost hundreds of billions per year. I'm all for clean air, but there is a question of just how clean and at what cost. A funny (for non-farmers) example is limits on Farm Methane Emissions (cow farts). [See the list]
Obamacare unfolds in the next four years: Medicaid expansion, Exchanges, the insurance mandate, preexisting conditions, and "accountable care organizations”.
Dodd-Frank requires hundreds of rules. Just the three days Dec 31 - Jan 2 requires nine final rules to be published.
Who knows what this means? Certainly, hundreds of billions of dollars are at stake. Industries, lawyers, and lobbyists are furiously helping to write all these rules.
We are sitting on a debt bomb. A few warned in 2004 that the huge mortgage debt could default, damaging the banks. Remember how that worked out?
That is our situation now with government debt. Who is now holding 10-30 year treasuries at slightly negative real rates of interest, bearing the risk of increased inflation and interest rates? Not me.
I really, really hope I'm wrong.
09/17/12 - DiploMad [edited]
The Obamistas are caught in a web of lies. Yes, lies. There is no other word.
If the attack in Benghazi were just a "spontaneous" eruption in response to a 14-minute video clip, then what is it exactly that we are investigating? Why are we apparently going to dispatch the FBI and drones?
What are we looking for? Do we need high-tech spies in the sky to find just "folks" who were outraged? Will our intel and counter-terror efforts now be focused on finding anything that could lead to a "spontaneous" outburst by the "folks" in the Middle East?
Are we going to be dispatching cops to haul in, say, movie makers who do something "offensive" to the "folks" in the Middle East? Nah, that's too extreme . . . we would never do that.
The Obamistas know the attack was planned; that our security in Benghazi was deplorable; that our security procedures, such as they were, were compromised; that the consulate in Benghazi should not have been open on 9/11; and that Ambassador Stevens should not have been there, especially on 9/11, especially after what was happening in Cairo.
In other words, State and NSC screwed up big time. The heads of both of those agencies should be on the chopping block, along with a host of other heads up and down the command chain at State and the NSC.
Fair Distribution of Life-YearsLink to Mises.org
Yuri N. Maltsev - 06/22/12 [edited]
Ezekiel Emanuel is director of the Clinical Bioethics Department at the US National Institutes of Health and an architect of ObamaCare. His brother is Rahm Emanuel, Obama's former Chief of staff.
Ezekiel Emanuel wrote in The Lancet medical journal Jan 2009 [edited]:
Allocation of healthcare by age is fair, unlike allocation by sex or race. Even if people aged 25 receive priority over those aged 65, everyone who is now 65 was previously 25.
It would be ageist to treat 65-year-olds differently because of stereotypes or falsehoods. It is fair to treat them differently because they have already received more life-years.
‘True Science’ vs ‘Cargo-Cult Science’Link to PajamasMedia
Professor Frank J. Tipler - 07/27/10 [edited]
The great Nobel Prize particle physicist Richard Feynman defined science in bold type, in his article “What is Science?”
Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.
Feynman: “When someone says, ‘Science teaches such and such,’ he is using the word incorrectly. Science doesn’t teach anything; experience teaches it. If they say to you, ‘Science has shown such and such,’ you should ask, ‘How does science show it?
How did the scientists find out? How? What? Where?’ It should not be ‘science has shown.’ And, you have as much right as anyone else, upon hearing about the experiments and after hearing all the evidence, to judge whether a sensible conclusion has been arrived at.”
Feynman also observedFrom his 1974 commencement address at The California Institute of Technology, CalTech. that real science was a method for discovering facts about our world, and required bending over backwards not to fool others, and especially not to fool oneself. He said it was particularly easy to fool oneself, and so required the greatest dilligence and openness to criticism and disproof to avoid being that fool.
Daily MailLink to this British newspaper: [edited] £30 million are available to NHS trusts (National Health Service) which put patients on the Liverpool Care Pathway. The goal is 66% of deaths on the LCP. These financial incentives could influence doctors.
The LCP withdraws life-saving treatment. Patients are sedated, and most are denied nutrition and fluids by tube. The average LCP patient dies within 29 hours.
The NHS is a model for the implementation of ObamaCare.
See InsureBlogMore about the British National Health Service for more.
10/29/08 - Banks bought AAA rated (rock-solid) mortgage securities. The ratings were given by government-approved agencies. The actual risk was possibly 10 times higher.
A part of We Guarantee It
Terms of UseSimply put:
Don't blame me.
Best PostsThis links to the posts I have labeled "Best". See also the cloud list of keywords below.
Light-Up Link SearchLocate links by typing search words. The links light up.
Poll - Politician IQShould politicians take an IQ test?
The Political DictionaryPolitical words have unusual meanings.
"greedy"See the definition ...
The Secret Political ManualThe hidden guide to politics has been discovered.
Political Speeches - SatireStandard political speeches for all occasions.
My book listSome books that aided my life
PostsMy Blog Posts
LinksLinks to posts, with summaries
ArchiveList of post titles by date
LabelsFind posts by keyword
QuipsQuotes, Jokes, Videos, Computer games
BlogsBlogs I read
Damage From the War on DrugsFred: Stop drug use at all costs. Drugs are making our kids into zombies.
Mike: Drugs aren't that bad. Prison and ruined lives produce real zombies. Did you know that Adderall, often prescribed to "hyperactive" kids, has the same effect as methamphetamine? It does have a nicer label.
- -
09/23/13 - YouTube video 22:17
[edited] Neuroscientist Carl Hart tried to verify the bad effects of drugs before researching treatments. He found that those bad effects were wildly exaggerated. The damage caused by law enforcement is much worse than the disease.
War on Drugs, Methamphetamine
(M)09/17/13 - New York Times - The Rational Choices of Crack Addicts [edited]
Dr. Hart studied addicts and saw that drugs were not irresistible after all. 80%-90% of crack and methamphetamine users don’t become addicted. The small number who are addicted are nothing like the popular caricatures.
(v)Via Coordination Problem
Global Warming 50 to 109/17/13 - Topher.com
[edited] A 10 minute video explains why it is 50 times more expensive to attempt to stop climate change than it is to adapt to climate change, assuming man-made factors are even a significant part of climate change. See also interviews giving the case against climate change hysteria.
The video uses data provided by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the government sponsored group which is promoting the hysteria.
Climate Change
(v)Powerline blog: The economics of climate change.
Barking CatsFred: The FDA is slowing down drug development by protecting its own bureaucratic, political interests. It is killing more people than it is protecting.
Mike: Let's have more oversight, reporting, and better people.
Fred: They ran an employment ad. Angels did not respond.
- -
02/21/13 - Cafe Hayek - Economist Donald Boudreaux quotes the late economist Milton Friedman [edited]
Friedman had written about the lethal effects of the Food and Drug Administration, almost certainly worse than any good effects, especially over time. Most people commented that they agreed, but wanted to change the FDA by finding better people, rather than abolish it.
Friedman: What would you think of someone who said, "I would like to have a cat, provided it barked"? Your statement about the FDA is precisely equivalent.
The biological laws that define cats and the political laws that define government agencies are both rigid. The bad results of FDA behavior are not an easily corrected human mistake. They come from its constitution in precisely the same way that a meow is part of a cat.
As a natural scientist, you recognize that you cannot assign characteristics at will to chemical and biological entities. You cannot make cats bark or water burn. Why would you suppose that the situation is different in the social sciences?
AMG: Politicians propose that government agencies will solve our problems. We imagine a few dedicated people who want to help. But, agencies are a hierarchy of hundreds or thousands of people. We know how they act and how they evolve. They make things worse.
Milton Friedman, FDA, bureaucracy
(M)John Latour provides Friedman's article from Newsweek of Jan 8, 1973.
Republicans Should Go For the HeartRepub: Let's work out solutions to these problems.
Dem: You go away, and we'll solve the problems through social justice.
Repub: Historically, all socialist governments have tried that and failed.
Dem: That was then, and they aren't us. We don't accept your miserable vision of a limited world. We will succeed this time.
- -
02/05/13 - Powerline
David Horowitz is a former leader of the New Left who now fights for good policy on the right. His long essay “Go For the Heart: How Republicans Can Win” is presented there. Here is an edited excerpt:
The issues for inner city schools are standards, accountability, and rewards for teacher performance. Republicans say this, but their moral outrage is missing, and they don't name the culprits and victims.
It is the Democrats who are ruining the lives and opportunities of African American and Hispanic children. It is not the generic “educational establishment”. Poor parents cannot afford the private schools where Democrat legislators and union leaders send their own children.
Republicans can show they care about minorities. Republicans can defend them against their oppressors and exploiters, who are Democrats in every major inner city in America. Democrats run the welfare and public education systems. They have created the policies that ruin the lives of the people who receive their handouts.
Republicans must hold Democrats to account. They must put them on the defensive and take away the moral high ground which they now occupy illegitimately. Government welfare is not just wasteful; it is destructive. The public school system in America’s inner cities is not merely ineffective; it is racist and criminal.
Democrats regard politics as war by other means. They do not seek compromise over practical solutions to complex problems. Their goal is power, to fundamentally transform American society into a socialist redistributionist state. Democrats regard Republicans as enemies standing in the way of social justice and progress.
Republican, Democrat, Elections
(v)David Horowitz has established GoForTheHeart.org to spread the message of this essay.
Prices Know What You Don'tFred: I wanted to be a musician, but I switched to accounting for the money.
Mike: Thank you for helping others rather than only selfishly enjoying yourself.
- -
01/17/13 01/03/13 by Prof. Michael Munger (video 4:34)
Prof. Munger advises: Let prices guide you to do good for the world. Prices sum up more information than any person or group can know. They tell you which current goods and services humanity needs most, better than any other mechanism.
Prices, Economic Knowledge
(v)Adam Smith Institute
Prosperity of Central PlanningMax: Government can greatly reduce waste, especially chaotic, unregulated production. The best minds at the top can organize society much better than isolated individuals grasping for profits.
Fred: Yes. Just look at the Soviet Union, before it collapsed.
- -
01/01/13 - Daily Mail Online
[edited] Not the Great Depression, but pictures of life in the Soviet Union around 1991, when it broke up into its member states, including Russia.
The dismal USSR economy was a result of its dogmatic Communist political system, at a time of rapidly improving living standards in the West.
AMG: People in the Soviet Union were not more stupid than Americans. After all, they built nuclear weapons.
The problem was a political theme that rich businessmen would steal from the people, and so were regulated into submission to the political state. Russian employment and the organization of "companies" was (and is) politically controlled. If you can't easily work for a new company, then your employer does not need to offer a higher wage to keep you at work, and does not need to innovate against new competition.
Soviet Union
(M)
Inside a Russian Billionaire's $300 Million Yacht
WSJ (Video 3:56)
Russian billionaires are doing quite well. Their political connections have allowed them to buy up large segments of the Russian economy during times of turmoil created by government. This is so much better than having billionaires created at random by a free market.
Down with the capitalists. Up with the benefactors nurtured by the state.
Government Style Medical InsuranceFred: I have very low-cost medical insurance through ObamaCare.
Mike: Now you can see very low-paid doctors.
- -
12/17/12 - White Coat's Call Room
[edited] Medicaid patients are getting what the government is paying (very little) for. Those in California can find few specialists to treat their non-emergency problems.
One man has been waiting more than a year for cataract surgery. Dermatology appointments can take up to a year. Cardiology 18 months. Many patients are directed to an emergency department.
California plans to cut payments to physicians by 10% more. Even fewer specialists will be available. Hey, at least the patients have affordable insurance, the same type of insurance that additional millions will receive from the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare).
AMG: ObamaCare, like current Medicare, prevents doctors from charging Medicaid/Medicare patients any more than Medicaid pays them. This is intended to prevent any diversion of services away from those patients. Put another way, the government prevents you from paying a little extra to get better or faster service. Happy?
When you control your own payment for health care, you are a valued customer. When you prepay through taxes, you are a cost and a statistic.
ObamaCare, Medicaid, California
(story)12/16/12 - LA Times. California's experience with Medicaid. Patients wait. They are the vanguard in experiencing the results of our more highly socialized healthcare.
In the Right DirectionSowell: I was a Marxist in college.
Barnes: What changed your thinking?
Sowell: I worked for a government agency.
- -
12/10/12 - 2005 - Fred Barnes interviews economist Thomas Sowell (4:32)
What defines liberals and conservatives? Why Sowell changed from Marxism to libertarianism. What history and economics tells us about government action to make us all better.
AMG: Sowell is a wonderfully clear thinker and speaker.
Thomas Sowell, Liberal, Conservative, Marxism
(M)2005 - In the Right Direction (40 min)
Fred Barnes interviews Thomas Sowell about his work and view of society.
Free Checkups For the HealthyFred: I have a sharp pain right here ...
Doctor: Sorry. This is your free checkup. I can't discuss any new symptoms.
Fred: So, what can I talk about?
Doctor: We'll start with how often you use seatbelts.
- -
11/24/12 - PJ Media by Dr. Peter Weiss
[edited] The ObamaCare free annual exam covers the exam and the status of previously diagnosed stable conditions, but not any new ailment. You will be charged a deductible and co-pay if you want to discuss any new ailment or unstable condition.
Your decision: do you want a “free” yearly exam, or do you want a regular visit coded for a new problem? The visit is “free” only if you discuss what Obamacare allows. You have to reschedule if you want to talk about a new problem.
Doctors must, by law, talk to you about your weight, exercise, family life, smoking, sexual abuse(!), and whether you wear seat belts. They must document your answers. Really.
AMG: Free services are available only if you don't need them, and are "free" in the sense that you have already paid for them.
ObamaCare, Free Exam
(M)EasyOpinions - Company Paid Health Insurance is Part of Your Salary
Increased insurance costs or penalties on your employer are a cost of employing you along with your cash salary. These will be deducted from any wage or raise which would otherwise have been offered. You are paying for your insurance; your employer is writing the check for you.
(M)11/2011 - WBUR.org [edited]
When Is Preventive Care Free?
An annual check-up is free, but you will be charged for the lab work. Some tests will start as a preventive screening, but will switch to a diagnostic test if there is a problem.
For example, a colonoscopy is free until the doctor finds (fairly often) a polyp. Then, the test is no longer preventive, it is a procedure and will be charged as a copay and against your deductible.
Fast & FuriousFred: Fast and Furious was a federal police effort. They merely lost track of a few guns.
Mike: The Feds merely lost track of 2,000 weapons sold to the Sinaloa drug cartel.
Fred: Well, they sold them, right? That is capitalism and market failure.
- -
06/23/12 - The Right Scoop -> Bill Whittle
President Obama is withholding documents by Executive Privilege. Was Fast & Furious a botched police effort or (more likely) an attempt to undermine the Second Amendment? (video 7:01)
Guns, Executive Privilege
(M)Paul Mirengoff at Powerline:
[edited] If Fast and Furious had been the product of a conspiracy by the administration to promote gun control legislation, the program would have come from the top down, not from the bottom up.
Fast and Furious was a very bad idea, poorly executed. But, as conservatives should understand, the government frequently implements very bad ideas and does so incompetently.
(M)10/14/12 - The DiploMad
A long time US Foreign Service Officer, retired.
[edited] Team Obama wanted to crack down on legal gun ownership in the US and justify international gun control treaties. Political bureaucrats at DOJ and ATF smuggled thousands of weapons to the Mexican drug cartels to "prove" that US gun shows and stores are dangerous suppliers.
The cartels used these weapons to murder hundreds, including women, children, and at least two US federal agents. In essence, Team Obama ran a covert war against Mexico to further its ideological obsession for reversing the second amendment.
At the State Department, we were told to put out the message that guns in Mexican drug violence came from the US. When visiting Mexico, President Obama himself stated "More than 90% of the guns recovered in Mexico come from the US, many from gun shops that line our shared border."
That is a lie at odds with reality.
The Swedish ModelMax: Sweden is a shining beacon where Socialism works to create a happy and prosperous people. How can you argue with that?
Fred: I'm not the one arguing. Good as Socialism may have been, Sweden is going Capitalist to actually produce jobs and pay the bills.
- -
05/08/12 -
[edited] Anders Borg is Sweden’s finance minister. Most of Europe has borrowed massively in hope of improving its economies. Borg's stimulus was a permanent tax cut. Critics said this was fiscal lunacy. Borg thought lunacy would be to repeat the economics of the 1970s and expect a different result.
Borg has proven correct three years later. The governments of Spain, Portugal, and the UK tried large, temporary stimulus. Very little of that stimulus went to the economy, but they are stuck with the debt. In contrast, Sweden had the fastest growth in Europe and celebrated the end of its deficit.
"Ownership and entrepreneurs are a production factor. Yes, these people are rich and you can argue that we want to encourage social cohesion. But it is problematic if you drive out entrepreneurs from your country, because they are the source of job creation."
Keynes, Stimulus, Tax Cuts, Sweden
(M)
His Story is Bunk -> Salisbury Review
Anders Åslund was a Professor at the Stockholm School of Economics 1989-94, now at the Peterson Institute for International Economics [edited]:
Sweden was quite a liberal market economy until 1968. Its per capita GDP was the third highest in the world after a century of superior growth. But in 1968, left-wing madness took over.
AMG: A short history of Sweden's experiment with socialism and economic decline.
Raise Tax Rates - Collect LessHigh Official: Our deep and nuanced understanding of reality gives us the duty and privilege to plan, invest, and guide our society. We must collect more resources, and so we will raise tax rates.
Assistant: Rates are quite high now, sir.
Official: We will set them higher.
Assistant: We will almost certainly collect less revenue and injure economic growth.
Official: That doesn't feel right. How could that be? I don't believe it. What fun is there in not raising rates? That is one nuance too far.
- -
02/27/12 - EO -> Dan Mitchel
[edited] Higher tax rates cripple growth and drive more people into the underground economy. The International Monetary Fund agrees in this analysis of the Greek economic situation. At some point, tax rates become so punitive that the government collects less revenue. A remarkable admission.
AMG: Also, bankrobber Willie Sutton understood Leftist tax policy.
Tax Rates
(M)Portugal Crashes on the Laffer Curve With Class Warfare Tax Policy
12/31/12 - Cato at Liberty by Daniel J. Mitchell
Rate increases have stretched Portugese taxes to the limit. Further increases in rates are unlikely to result in increased revenue. Income from the value added tax, about 36% of the total, has been falling since 2008, despite a sharp increase to a 23% rate.
Both the Bank for International Settlements and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development find that the United States faces a bigger long-run fiscal challenge than Portugal.
Squeezing Emergency DepartmentsFred: I feel bad, I'm sweating, and I have chest pain.
Doctor: What is your insurance?
Fred: Medicaid.
Doctor: No need to come in to the ER just yet. We'll wait until tomorrow to see if it is a real emergency.
- -
02/14/12 - Road To Hellth
[edited] Medicaid in Washington State is rapidly going broke, like nearly all public healthcare systems. A $1.4 billion budget gap requires WA to cut many benefits to its poor Medicaid population. WA will no longer pay for emergency department (ED) visits which are not true emergencies.
The federal law EMTALA controls every hospital ED which accepts federal insurance. The ED must evaluate and treat every person who comes in, regardless of race, sex, nationality, or ability to pay.
Despite this requirement, WA will only pay the hospital for its services if the medical evaluation indeed found an emergency. The hospital cannot bill the patient.
Emergency departments do have an option. One-third have closed over the last 20 years.
Medicaid, Emergency Departments, Broke
(M)Mary: My baby is coughing. I didn't want to wait until Monday.
Doctor: Some cough syrup should fix ... What is your insurance?
Mary: Medicaid.
Doctor: Well ... Not to worry you, but that cough could be RSV or pneumonitis. Let's look at her blood, get a chest x-ray, and start a nebulizer. Don't worry, Washington Medicaid pays for those.
- -
02/16/12 - White Coat's Call Room
[edited] Hospitals and ER doctors will take a financial hit if WA decides after the fact that Medicaid ER treatment was "unnecessary".
The chart records a patient’s complaints, diagnosis, and treatment. The same doctors who want to be paid fill out that chart and give treatment. Look for a sharp increase in diagnoses that WA does not deem “unnecessary.” Reimbursable diagnoses are usually more serious and cost more. WA will probably end up paying more for Medicaid emergency patients.
AMG: This also defends against those pesky lawsuits. A win-win.
Medicaid Emergency
(M)Sep 2009 - Easy Opinions: ObamaCare bails out Medicare
The promises of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security cannot be paid. Democrats want to put everyone in the same plan so that seniors don't feel as strongly about denial of care, and the young can be made to pay much more. We will all be in the same boat. Some have signed on, and others will be "persuaded".
Aptitude Tests vs CollegeFred: My high grades and SAT scores got me into Big College. I'm on my way.
Mike: After you pay $120,000 in tuition and lose four years of wages.
Fred: There will be some studying, but also parties and girls.
Mike: Too bad you couldn't present your grades and SATs to some company, earn while you learn, party in your own apartment, and buy two sports cars with that $120,000.
- -
11/13/11 - Carpe Diem by economist Mark J. Perry
George Will: [edited] There were 2,000+ personnel tests available to employers in 1964. But, an Illinois official ruled that these might be unfair to disadvantaged groups. Employers were burdened to prove that a test was a "business necessity" for a particular job if it had a "disparate impact" [ Black and White applicants did unequally on the test].
Many employers feared endless litigation. They switched to requiring college degrees as indicators of intelligence and diligence. This was one reason college attendance increased from 5.8 million in 1970 to 17.5 million in 2005.
Peter Thiel: [edited] Higher education is a giant selection mechanism. 10% of the value of a college degree comes from learning, 50% from getting into a selective university, and 40% from graduating from a selective college known to employers.
It might be much more efficient if employers could use intelligence tests instead of expensive four-year college degrees that add very little educational value.
Disparate impact, College degree
(M)
College is an Expensive IQ Test
July 2008 and updates - Easy Opinions
By law, a company cannot give an employment test unless it has been shown to be non-discriminatory in effect. That means it doesn't screen out people of color at a different effective rate than white people.
So, employers don't create their own tests or use standardized tests. Interviewers talk randomly about whatever they want, using personal judgment to decide if the candidate is "a good match". This is supposed to be less discriminatory.
What Caused the Financial Crisis?Max: Heartless banks on Wall Street caused our crisis by lending money wildly to people who couldn't repay the loans. They robbed us all.
Mike: Congress asked, then required banks to do this, and knowingly bought those loans from the banks. The Government-created companies Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac took on all the risk so that Congress could play this game.
Max: The banks bribed Congress.
Mike: Congress started this. And you know, you can't bribe an honest politician.
- -
11/12/11 - Powerline by John Hinderaker
From the Washington Examiner
[edited] The financial crash was complex, but the basics are not hard to understand. The federal government wanted to increase home ownership by encouraging banks to make loans to underqualified buyers. These would traditionally have been called bad loans.
The government used a carrot-and-stick approach. The stick was constant pressure on banks to show that they were not excluding black neighborhoods, but rather were taking their share of risk on home loans. The carrot was Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac, government sponsored companies which reassured banks that they could make bad loans without fear of the usual consequences. Fannie and Freddy would immediately buy those loans, taking all of the risk.
Michael Bloomberg is the Independent mayor of New York City, previously a Democrat, who first won office by running temporarily under the Republican banner.
He said recently, “It was not the banks that created the mortgage crisis. It was Congress, plain and simple, who forced everybody to give mortgages to people who were on the edge. Congress pushed Fannie and Freddie to make a bunch of loans that were imprudent, if you will.”
AMG: See my investigation of the crisis at the (M) link on this entry.
Financial Crisis, Housing Crisis, Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac
(M)October 2008 - Easy Opinions
We Guarantee It - The Government Caused the Economic Crisis
The current recession was triggered by collapsing home prices and mortgage losses, after an extended period of government providing easy money and guarantees to support Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and risky mortgage loans. The government is still doing this. The bad housing policy was designed, encouraged, and required by government.
Soak the Yachts and JetsMax: We are going to tax the Rich until they sweat.
Jim: What if employment and tax revenue go down?
Max: It is worth it, to see them sweat. Then we will tax big boats, big houses, and big cars.
Jim: I see where you are going. How big a car do you drive, if you don't mind my asking? I want to choose wisely when I buy my next one.
- -
10/30/11 - Grouchy Old Cripple
[edited] Walter Williams: President Obama has called for a luxury tax on corporate jets to raise revenue to reduce federal deficits. Consider that Obama proposed in his election campaign, to raise capital gains taxes as a matter of fairness, even though that would decrease tax revenues. Lose tax revenue? No wonder our economy is hosed with this idiot in charge.
George H.W. Bush tried a similar policy in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, breaking his "read my lips" pledge not to raise taxes.
This Act imposed a 10% luxury tax on yachts, private airplanes, and expensive automobiles, Sen. Ted Kennedy and Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell crowed publicly about how the rich would finally be paying their fair share.
Edmund Contoski at the Heartland Institute: Within eight months, the largest builder Viking Yachts laid off 1,140 of its 1,400 employees and closed one of its two manufacturing plants. Its employment later fell to 68 employees.
In the first year, one-third of U.S. yacht-building companies stopped production, and the industry lost 7,600 jobs. Eventually, 100,000 workers lost their jobs making yachts, parts, and materials. The US had been a net exporter of yachts; it became a net importer. Jobs shifted to companies in Europe and the Bahamas. The U.S. Treasury collected zero revenue from sales driven overseas.
Luxury Tax, Yachts
(M)08/09/11 - Walter Williams at Lew Rockwell
(v)Via Daily Pundit
Income InequalityFred: The rich take their money out of the pockets of workers and consumers.
Mike: They take out $5 from the $100 they put in.
- -
10/27/11 - Paul Solmon of PBS interviews Law Prof. Richard Epstein. Epstein talks quickly and directly. The interview flies by. Video 8:58 and a transcript. [paraphrased]
Solmon: What is good about income inequality?
Epstein: The incentive for large gains spurs people to work, risk, and invest. Removing their large incomes slows innovation and production, and everyone becomes poorer. [ The poor are hardest hit in a slowed economy -ag ]
Solmon: Doesn't great disparity in wealth injure society?
Epstein: Consider Bill Gates. He has accumulated $50 billion. And, he has produced 20 times that much in value to consumers. That is a good deal. [ The wealthiest people personally earn about 5% of the value they create. -ag ]
Wealth, Income Inequality
(v)Via Instapundit
Job Creation MythPolitician: I'm cooked! That last program I supported has made things worse.
Advisor: Propose another program to fix, I mean extend, the first program. You will be doing something to meet the current crisis.
Politician: But, I will be publicly criticizing my own policies.
Advisor: Merely say that you are correcting the failed policies of the past arising from a Washington culture of corruption and special favors.
- -
10/10/11 - Reason by Matt Welch
[edited] Belief in stimulus spending despite repeated failure suggests that powerful myths continue to control politicians and many of their constituents.
Among the most stubborn myths is that passing a bill to fix a problem is the same as actually fixing the problem. This assumption reaches its illogical conclusion during times of national panic. Do-something busybodies like New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg say that it doesn’t matter what Washington does, it just needs to do something. They are oblivious to unintended consequences, corporatist lobbying, and the limitations of government power.
The result of current Keynesian stimulus should speak for itself. Fewer able-bodied Americans are employed as a percentage of the potential work force than at any time since 1983.
Political Myth, Stimulus
(v)Via Cold Fury
Pilgrim's ProgressJim: Gack! This soup is terrible. You must put more effort into it.
Joe: I didn't study much cooking in Slave School.
- -
11/26/09 - CafeHayek by Don Boudreaux
Plymouth Plantation in 1620 had communal property rights, holding food and supplies in common. Plantation officials distributed them based on equality and need. Residents received equal rations whether or not they produced food, and they were forbidden from producing their own food.
The Pilgrims were starving under their communal system, and changed it to survive.
This may remind you a bit of congress's healthcare plans. Let's learn from the Pilgrims and be thankful for their effort.
(M)11/27/09 - powerlineblog by Prof. Paul Rahe
America's First Socialist Republic
[edited] We can learn from the history of the Pilgrims at Plymouth Plantation. They conducted an experiment in social engineering akin to what is now contemplated.
They cultivated the land in common, with dismal results. Their experience can instruct us today.
The Regulatory Speed TrapDoctor: What is the applicable rule for treating my patient?
Central Authority: The rules are complicated. The best thing for you is to do what I tell you.
- -
09/19/11 - Covert Rationing blog
[edited] The Regulatory Speed Trap is a set of complicated regulations. Sometimes, complexity and self-contradictions grow over time without planning, as with the Medicare regulations over several decades. Sometimes, regulations that cannot be complied with are applied suddenly, as with the Lacey Act and Gibson Guitars. And sometimes, a massive web of impossible regulations is created whole, as with the Dodd-Frank legislation of banks and financial firms.
Our Progressive leaders persistently attempt to establish the perfect society by controlling “everything” from the top down. They have discovered, in unending delight, that mature bureaucracies apply a tangle of vague and contradictory regulations through informal rules and forbearance. Everyone Is Always Guilty Of Something when the rules are strictly applied.
Even without ObamaCare, the morass of existing rules, regulations and “guidelines” means that the Central Authority can suddenly construe some rule to make a criminal of virtually any worker or institution dealing with the healthcare system. Under these conditions, the good of the collective comes before the good of a patient.
ObamaCare, Regulation
(M)A Regulatory Speed Trap Waiting To Be Sprung
10/10/11 - Covert Rationing by DrRich [edited]
The OHRP within the department of Healh and Human Services in 1994 wanted more diversity in medical trials. This good idea was extended to impossible requirements.
OHRP mandated that all minorities and all genders must be included in all clinical trials, in sufficient numbers to give reliable statistics for each category. The cost of doing this was not acceptable as a reason to not do it.
OHRP defined six racial and ethnic categories: Hispanic, Native American, Asian, Pacific Islander, African American, and White. The three genders are Male, Female, and Indeterminate or Transgender.
Six races × 3 genders is 18 categories. A study requiring 1,000 patients for statistical validity would now need 18,000 patients in just the right distributions, including 1,000 transgender Pacific Islanders.
This rule would have ended medical trials. So, we interpreted this rule to require all practical efforts to use diversified groups.
The Central Authority today is desperately looking for ways to stifle medical progress and slow increases in medical spending. This clear diversity requirement, long ignored in detail, can be applied at any time to shut down chosen medical studies.
AMG: No wonder US medical research is so expensive. Logic does not require every trial to be diverse. At most, only the final trials preceeding drug approval. Also, isn't this a racist attitude by OHRP? They are saying that these groups are obviously medically different. That is biological racism in the absence of any evidence.
Rich Pay Higher Tax Rates Than SecretariesActivist: Many rich people use loopholes to pay low or no tax.
Retired: Like buying state bonds and investing in companies.
Activist: You can smile now. We'll get your money when you die.
Retired: Warren Buffett is giving his billions to charities, and won't pay much inheritance tax. I'm following his example. Sorry.
- -
09/19/11 - Carpe Diem by Mark J. Perry
[edited] The US federal income tax is highly progressive. Warren Buffett is wrong in his "analysis" of tax rates on himself and his employees.
Most secretaries would pay a federal tax rate averaging 9-12%. Most "super-rich" bosses with incomes of $200,000+ would pay a tax rate averaging at least 25%, about three times higher than their secretarial staff.
If you include payroll taxes, the super-rich are paying at twice the average rate of secretaries.
AMG: See the chart of 2009 adjusted gross incomes compared to the average federal tax rate imposed.
Federal Taxes, Warren Buffet
(M)
09/20/11 - Cold Fury → AP story
[edited] On average, the wealthiest Americans pay much more tax than the middle class or the poor, and pay a much larger share of overall taxes. The top 10% of households pay more than 70% of federal income taxes.
The Logic of FailureMary: Your casserole is delicious. Would you give me the recipe?
Carol: Here it is. You might want to make it a few times before inviting guests.
Mary: Why? All of the steps are here, right?
Carol: That is what I thought, the first three times I made it.
- -
09/18/11 - 12/29/03 - Photon Plaza
[edited] Dietrich Doerner studies the inability of people to understand and manage complex systems.
One simulation puts the participant in charge of a third-world country, something like the computer game Sim City. Decisions include land use, water supply, and medical care. Time delays and multiple interactions make success difficult. A high proportion of participants made things worse for their country. Dorner concludes that people have much more difficulty understanding patterns that extend over time than understanding spatial patterns.
Many participants focused on one aspect, such as building irrigation canals, and ignored everything else, without really trying to understand the interactions.
AMG: These results suggest why government planners and academic advisors do miserably at directing our society.
Their rules are slow to be applied, to change, and to be removed. They cannot respond in time to changing circumstances.
Academics study simplified models which do not account for the changing, detailed situations of actual administration. This leads to bureaucrats applying fixed rules, even when the outcome is absurd.
Politicians concentrate on one or two measures of supposed success. They maximize these measures despite outcomes which are mediocre (at best) when viewed more generally. For example, government spending raises GDP, so it supposedly must be good.
Politicians hide bad outcomes from the public. Businesses must face the reality of success or failure, and adjust accordingly to deliver products of value to their customers.
Logic, Failure, Intelligence
(M)09/18/11 - The Social Pathologist [edited]
Most people do poorly at understanding reality. The kicker is that the participants in Dormer's studies are university graduates and professionals, people on the high side of the IQ curve. Dormer did not explicitly study IQ as it relates to complex planning, but he noted that there seemed to be no correlation between IQ and success. Personally, I feel that ability to plan for multiple interactions peaks at about IQ 125, dropping off rapidly on either side.
(v)Chicago Boyz: The Logic of Failure, Redux
The "Otherwise Would Be" PoorFred: I'm out of work. I collect unemployment.
Mike: Let me help. I didn't know it was bad for you.
Fred: No way. When the checks run out, I'll have to get a job. Feel sorry for me then.
- -
09/14/11 - EconLib by David Henderson [edited]
Tim Worstall: The federal government counts people who are poor without considering many of the benefits the poor receive. If those benefits were included, many millions of those people would not be considered poor.
David Henderson: There is a proposal to increase the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) by applying it to people with larger incomes. Workers at the new upper end would likely cut their work hours. They would recieve less in wages, offset partly by more income through the EITC.
They would be better off than before, counting the subsidy and more leisure, but their before-tax incomes would fall. Statistics would show an increase in poverty, and advocates might call for even larger EITC subsidies.
AMG: Statistics which include people who would be poor without benefits ignore the help they are already getting and exaggerates actual poverty. We should know three figures, the fraction of people in poverty despite aid, the number who are not in poverty because of aid, and the estimated amount people choose not to earn because they are receiving aid.
Poverty, The Poor, Subsidies
(v)Via Cafe Hayek
A collection of links on wellfare statistics and the condition of Social Security.
(M)09/16/11 - Daniel J. Mitchell [edited]
Which State Has the Biggest Welfare Benefits of All?
We’re supposed to conclude that welfare benefits are too low. But, some states are providing welfare checks greater than 30% and 40% of the poverty level.
The poverty line is considerably above a level of material deprivation, $11,139 for an individual and $22,113 for a family of four. That is far above the average income in most nations.
Welfare checks are just one of many supplements. The data here does not count food stamps, Medicaid, housing subsidies, and a plethora of means-tested programs. Poor people have surprisingly high levels of consumption.
Clinton's Taxes Did Not Produce JobsProgressive: Raising taxes produces jobs. Clinton proved it.
Mike: The economy improved four years after Clinton's tax increases, coincidentally with lowered taxes from a Republican congress. Tell me the details. How do higher taxes produce jobs?
Progressive: I don't know the details. Progressive history tells us that.
- -
09/13/11 - PolitiFact Truth-O-Meter
[edited] President Obama and his supporters insist that the Clinton tax hikes spurred the boom of the 1990s and that the subsequent Bush tax cuts hurt the economy. Indeed, employment grew quickly through the mid 1990s after Clinton's tax hike, and jobs didn't grow as quickly after the Bush tax cuts.
J.D. Foster is an economist with the Heritage Foundation. He criticizes the idea that raising tax rates is good for job growth. The economy was poised for a dramatic boom in 1993. Instead, we got negative real wage growth after tax hikes.
The Clinton boom started four years later in 1997, coinciding with Republicans taking firmer control of the budget, welfare reform, and a lower tax rate on capital gains. These lower-tax policies at least contributed to the boom. It is laughable that Clinton's tax hikes somehow led to a boom that began four years later.
AMG: Reliable comparisons and knowledge come from a fine grained analysis of policies and effects. Some people argue that higher tax rates correspond to prosperity over some periods. They should explain in detail just how a higher tax rate can produce jobs and prosperity. Is it because the government is known to be an efficient producer of wealth?
Clinton, Higher Tax Rates, Jobs
(M)
Tax Cuts Produced the 1990s Boom, Not the Clinton Tax Hikes
03/04/2008 - Heritage.org by J.D. Foster
[edited] President Clinton pushed a major tax increase through Congress in 1993. Then, the story goes, the economy boomed. So, how can tax increases be bad for the economy? Maybe higher taxes strengthen the economy.
This story fails under closer scrutiny. Economic growth was solid but hardly spectacular in the years immediately following the 1993 tax increase. The real economic boom occurred after the 1997 tax cut. Low taxes are still a key to a strong economy.
(M)The Clinton Tax Hikes Slowed Growth, and the Bush Cuts Promoted Recovery
09/06/11 - Heritage.org by Curtis Dubay
[edited] Team Obama insists that a tax increase will not impede economic recovery. They claim that the Clinton tax hikes spurred a boom in the 1990s, and that the subsequent Bush tax cuts hurt the economy. A detailed review shows the reverse.
Milton Friedman - Social Security MythGovernment: Social Security is a farsighted program to stabilize our society, by requiring that people prudently make contributions to support some of their retirement.
Critic: Without saving or investing, by pointing a gun at their children, and saying "Pay up".
- -
09/13/11 - Wisbang by Michael Laprarie
[edited] The late economist Milton Friedman talked about Social Security 30 years ago (video 9:56).
There was no underlying public demand for Social Security, “the greatest sacred cow of them all”.
SSec is a combination of a regressive payroll tax ("contributions") and inequitable income subsidies ("benefits").
SSec was sold as an insurance program, but it is operated as a direct tax on younger generations to subsidize the old. People are not saving for their own retirement; they are arranging to take money from their children. It is recognized by many as a Ponzi scheme.
Sarah Palin adds clear and direct thoughts.
Social Security, Milton Friedman, Ponzi Scheme, Sarah Palin
(M)09/13/11 - ZeroHedge by Tyler Durden
Progressive Nobel Prize economist Paul Krugman in 1997: "Social Security Is A Ponzi Scheme And Will Soon Be Over"
(M)
09/16/11 - Mark J. Perry [edited]
Is Social Security a Ponzi scheme? Links to articles.
Michael Tanner at Cato: At least Ponzi didn't force people to enroll. Social Security will not go broke as long as the government can force people to pay more taxes and accept fewer benefits. Is that better or worse than a Ponzi scheme?
Columnist Charles Krauthammer: Social Security is the most vital, humane, and fixable of all social programs. Forget Ponzi, are we going to fix it?
Dean Kalahar at Real Clear Markets: The truth is coming our way. As the baby boom retires, the takers will outnumber the payers. Social Security will collapse like a house of cards and take the American economy with it.
Peer Review and Sloppy ScienceQuote of Note: Phil Jones's work is central to theories of global warming. He responded to a request for his detailed data and methods: “We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?”
- -
09/10/11 - The Economist
An Array of Errors
[edited] Researchers Anil Potti and Joseph Nevins at Duke University published that they could predict the course of lung cancer using expression arrays, colorful activity patterns of thousands of genes in a tissue sample. The research was sloppy and wrong, despite initial peer review and repeated publication in respected medical journals. Those journals refused most critical comment.
AMG: Bad science refuses to allow review and criticism of the data, statistics, and computer code used to produce conclusions. Researchers fear that mistakes will be discovered. Note that many climate scientists will not release supporting data and methods for independent confirmation.
Peer Review, Science, Data
(M)Easy Opinions - Dispelling the Global Warming Myth
The story about Phil Jones refusal to make his detailed research public for scientific review.
Refuse to Be TerrorizedFred: I support TSA scanners, body and backpack searches, travel restrictions, increased law enforcement, warrentless wiretaps, and comprehensive databases of suspicious activity. I refuse to be terrorized.
Mike: Except by your own government.
- -
09/09/11 - Knowledge Problem
[edited] Lynne Kiesling: The American people have accepted invasive search, extensive surveillance, and militarization of law enforcement. There is little or no analysis whether the benefits of reduced attacks justify the enormous financial, social, and cultural costs of our growing military-industrial complex.
Bruce Schneier: The point of terrorism is to further a political goal or express sheer hatred. The people killed are collateral damage. Blowing up planes or buses is not the goal, only tactics.
The rest of us are the real targets, not killed but terrorized. The real point is our reaction to the act. We are doing exactly what the terrorists want.
AMG: An autoimmune disease arises from an excessive reaction to an infection. A person remains ill long after an appropriate defense is in place. The continued immune reaction causes disability, and possibly death from the destruction of vital organs. Our response to Al Qaeda has gone far beyond deterrence, and is itself weakening us economically and civicly.
Al Qaeda, Terrorism
(M)Bruce Schneier in Wired from 2006
Why Not Universal College?Fred: I dreamed of being a highly paid industrial engineer.
Mike: Did lack of funds stop you?
Fred: No. I hated mathematics, physics, chemistry, and statistics.
- -
09/08/11 - EconLog by Bryan Caplan
[edited] You may think that (almost) everyone should go to college. If so, does it follow that (almost) everyone should major in a high-paid technical field like engineering, medicine, or computer science?
If increased income is an overpowering reason to go to college, then the even larger income from a technical degree must be an overpowering reason to major in a technical field.
AMG: Most failed policy comes from misunderstanding cause and effect. College graduates make more money than high school graduates. Did the college education do that, or do colleges select for people who have the brains and temperament for later success?
I think it is almost all selection, not a miracle of college coursework.
College, Income
(M)09/08/11 - StarPress
"Thirty-seven percent are unclear about why they are coming to college."
What Green Jobs?Fred: The government announced 300 new green jobs today.
Mike: Did they also announce the job losses?
- -
09/02/11 - The Telegraph UK by James Delingpole
[edited] Gordon Hughes is Professor of Economics at Edinburgh University. His online report is The Myth of Green Jobs.
He concludes that “Green jobs” are a loss overall. Diverting taxpayer money into the renewable energy sector may indeed “create” jobs there, at the cost of many more jobs in the broader economy.
They expect the ordinary man to sit quietly as the cost of his energy doubles, his standard of living goes down, the countryside is ruined, and the ailing economy is worsened by a Government which no longer gives a damn what he thinks about anything.
AMG: A review of the true costs in Britain and the political deals which guide investment into expensive, green technology.
green jobs, renewable
(v)Via Instapundit
Hands Up, Put Down That GuitarBusinessman: What permits do I need for my business?
Justice Dept: Get the ones you think are best. We'll review your work and prosecute you if you get it wrong. We don't run your business. We can't predict every little thing.
- -
08/27/11 - Richard Fernandez
[edited] The Department of Justice has raided Gibson guitar factories, seizing pallets of wood and wooden guitars. The reason given is that Gibson is using wood harvested from the Third World in environmentally harmful ways. Gibson has permits from those foreign governments, US Customs, and the Forest Stewardship Council. The DOJ has not raided other, similar guitar manufacturers.
Was it because Gibson is a non-union shop? Did they offend some powerful interest? What more could they have done to prove that their wood was legit? "Kafkaesque" comes to mind.
Cross an international border with an instrument made of Brazilian Rosewood, and you better have complete documentation proving the age of the instrument. Otherwise, you could lose it to a zealous customs agent and face fines and prosecution.
Kafkaesque, Gibson quitars, Justice Department
(M)08/27/11 - Doug Ross Journal
[edited] One of Gibson’s leading competitors is C.F. Martin. Its CEO, Chris Martin IV gave $35,400 to Democratic candidates and the DNC over the past few election cycles. C.F. Martin’s catalog shows several of their guitars contain “East Indian Rosewood”, the same wood confiscated from Gibson.
Negotiating with an OrganizerFred: If you don't compromise, I will shoot your sister.
Max: Hah! We both know you won't do that.
Fred: I give in. It was a bluff.
Max: You should have threatened to shoot my dog.
- -
08/05/11 - ChicagoBoyz → ArtChance
[edited] The Republicans negotiate from “Getting to Yes”. Obama and his ilk negotiate from Alinsky's “Rules for Radicals.” Obama didn’t want a deal in the recent debt debate. He wanted and got a political process that could be played to his advantage against the “nice guy” Republicans.
Following Alinsky, he never made a concrete proposal, just pie in the sky positions. He made the Republicans negotiate with themselves to present something he would buy. Like negotiating with a public employee union, if you start by wanting an agreement, you wind up compromising yourself into their position. That is what Boehner and McConnell did.
To bargain with a communist-trained negotiator, you must start with a position that would kill him politically or economically if he accepted it. You really have to do what the Dems were accusing the Tea Party of. You must say quietly, “be reasonable so I don’t have to give you this alternative.”
AMG: The Republicans started with "default for a few weeks would be better than your continued spending and increasing debt". But, they fearfully accepted insignificant and false spending cuts rather than endure default.
The Republicans argued for the good, but their negotiating position became a bluff, and the Dems called it.
Debt Limit, Alinsky, Negotiating
(M)Saul Alinsky: Rules For Radicals [online]
(M)05/14/11 - Daily Pundit by Bill Quick
US Default Is Best
A few weeks of default would not be a disaster. Continued borrowing and spending will be.
Keynes Brilliant MomentFred: Keynes proposed that everyone would have a job if the government would print more money.
Mike: If true, why would anyone work?
- -
08/01/11 - EasyOpinions
A lost recording reveals the economist Keynes' moment of discovery.
Keynes, Economics, Employment
Obama won't show you the plan.Sally: I do have a plan. Yes I do.
Jane: Let's see it then.
Sally: It's a secret. It's for me to know and for you to find out. [sticks tongue out] Nyah Nyah Nyah.
- -
07/26/11 - Ace of Spades
Obama's Communications Director Jay Carney answers reporter Chuck Todd.
Carney: No, we won't write our plan down. To even ask that the President show his plan is to repeat a Republican talking point.
Todd: Release your plan.
Carney: We've shown a lot of leg.
Todd: Why not just release it?
Carney: You need it written down?
AMG: Obama is President of the United States. He has a vast staff and analytical support. The US has a budget crisis. Does Obama not have a written plan? That would be abject incompetence. Not showing that plan? Irresponsible manipulation of this country's future.
Who is responsible for threatening the well being of our country? Obama says in effect: Not me, look over there. Those Republicans with the wrong, written plan are the ones who are manipulating this situation.
Budget, Written Plan
(M)07/26/11 - Hot Air by Allahpundit
Why hasn't Obama produced his own debt-ceiling plan?
[edited] His first budget failed unanimously in the Senate. Since then, Obama has not offered a specific plan of his own on virtually anything. He talks about “visions”, “contours”, and “frameworks”.
In the last five days, the president has (a) undermined a bargain with John Boehner by demanding an unacceptable eleventh-hour condition, (b) rejected “out of hand” a bipartisan compromise, and (c) delivered a speech that painted his opponents as intractable extremists.
Americans want to know Obama’s proposed, detailed solution. The White House dismissed that question as a GOP talking point. Carney condescended to ask the reporter if he was capable of taking notes.
The Memory of IdiotsFred: I haven't seen you in a while. How are things?
Mike: (looks up information on tablet PC) Yes, Fred! Pretty good. Let's meet later to talk. Or, you could just review my tweets.
- -
07/15/11 - RiehlWorldView by Sissy Willis
[edited] Researchers at Columbia wonder if the internet is ruining our minds.
As Roseanne Roseannadanna said, "It's always something -- if it ain't one thing, it's another".
Memory, Internet, Sarcasm
(M)Roseanne Roseannadanna was a character on Saturday Night Live played by Gilda Radner.
The Space ShuttleFred: Each $1 billion space shuttle was reusable, so it saved money.
Mike: Much better than using up a Saturn V, at $10 million about 1/100th the cost.
Fred: Men and women found glory going into space.
Mike: The ones who survived.
- -
07/15/11 - Mises by Timothy Terrell
[edited] George S. Giles: It would be hard to think of a more expensive way to put payload into orbit. The shuttle cost more than $1 billion. It does not fly like a plane although it looks like one. Flight control computers by IBM do the flying. The pilots only drop the wheels on landing.
A Saturn V cost $10 million. After the Challenger blew up, congress said to NASA, “Let’s go back to building the Saturn V because it is cheaper, more reliable, and lifts more payload into a higher orbit.” NASA responded, “We can’t, because we threw the plans away.”
Space Shuttle
(M)
07/21/11 - Mises by David Veksler
The Space Shuttle is dead. Good riddance!
[edited] Building the shuttle was estimated at $5 billion to deliver stuff to orbit at $118 per pound. It was intended to fly much like a plane, cheap and easily serviced, with massive cargo capacity, and flights every few weeks.
The reality was different when completed in 1981. It was 20% too heavy to deliver intended military payloads. The payload cost was $27,000 per pound delivered to orbit. The overhaul after each flight took many months and cost $1.5 billion. Regular “shuttle” service was impractical.
The shuttle exploded with cargo and crew every decade or so, costing about $12 billion to redesign, idle in the meantime.
The shuttle was a total failure from the start.
Obama Makes Up Threat to Starve GrandmaReporter: With less money available, will you cut the federal workforce?
Obama: We may have to cut off granny first.
- -
07/13/11 - Washington Examiner by Mark Tapscott
[edited] Washington receives about $200 billion monthly and sends out about $100 billion for Social Security and Medicare. Why is Obama claiming the checks may not go out?
Obama is playing the demogogue. He is trying to scare seniors into making panicked calls to their congressmen, begging them to do whatever Obama and the Democrats want in order to keep the checks coming.
Debt Limit, Obama
(v)Via Instapundit
A Wide Awake LiberalTeam Obama: We Liberals will efficiently regulate healthcare and take more taxes from the successful for a fairer society. Any criticism of this is shortsighted stupidity and against the common good.
Jane: I supported Liberalism to support my personal freedom and to say what I want. Your brand of Liberalism is about controlling my life and limiting my speech. No way.
- -
07/11/11 - The Macho Response
A Flower Child Grows Up
Jodi Carroll gives a great presentation about her desire for personal freedom of choice. She presents how Obama's definition of a Liberal leaves her feeling controlled. Video 13:14.
Liberal, Obama, Freedom
(M)07/08/11 Big Government - Bob Parks interviews the "Regretful Obama Voter"
Jodi Carroll: [edited] I was born to really cherish freedom. I have always been called a “free spirit” by those who know me well. For a long time, I believed that freedom was what liberalism was all about.
Perfecting Your ChildParent: Mickey is unhappy about his demanding schedule of extra education, but he will thank us later.
Friend: When he calls once a year?
- -
06/30/11 - EconLog by Bryan Caplan
[edited] A question for perfectionist parents who strive to raise prodigies. Instead of pushing your kids to succeed, why not try to perfect yourself instead? Take piano lessons for three hours a day, or master Mandarin.
The answer is obvious. There is a huge opportunity cost for these activities, and a low expected payoff.
So, instead of perfecting yourself or your children, show them by constant example how reasonable, just, and loving one human being can be to another.
Education, Child Development, Parenting
(M)11/15/10 - Raising Successful Children
Econlog by Bryan Caplan
[edited] Science supports the sentimental view that parents should simply cherish, encourage, and accept their children. Studies of twins show that upbringing has much less affect on success than most of us believe.
Modern parents need to calm down and see their family time as leisure, not work. Having fun with your children may not prepare them for the future, but there are few more rewarding ways to spend your time.
Gas Price HypocrisyDemocrats: May 2007 - High gas prices show the corruption of the capitalist, corporatist running dogs George Bush and Dick Cheney. They hate the working man.
Democrats: April 2011 - High gas prices save lives, from less driving and pollution. If you feel an economic pinch, try buying a smaller new car with higher efficiency.
- -
05/23/11 - Don Smith - video 4:20
[summary] In May 2007, Democrats led by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi pointed to the damaging, high price of gasoline at $3 per gallon. They said that this proved the corruption of then President George Bush and VP Dick Cheney. In 2008, candidate Obama spoke to the tragedy of high gas prices. This theme helped elect Obama and gain control of both houses of Congress.
Gasoline was $1.87 per gallon when Obama was elected, and is now $4.00. Today, Obama smiles when people complain about high prices, and suggests that they buy a hybrid. The Progressive news media promotes high gas prices as saving lives. Less use of gasoline produces less pollution, which by their calculation, saves many lives.
AMG: By this reasoning, gasoline kills people, so let's just ban its use. Is that the sophisticated economic insight which you want applied to running the USA?
High Gasoline Prices
(v)Via Cafe Hayek
(v)The Don Smith Show
US Default Is BestFred: If the Republicans play chicken with the Debt Limit, the US could default!
Mike: The US still has credit. Default now would be technical, only a delay in making interest payments on our debt. If we don't stop our reckless borrowing, we may face no ability to borrow or repay, without much warning. That is not technical. That is bankruptcy. They repossess the auto while we eat peanut butter sandwiches.
- -
05/14/11 - Daily Pundit by Bill Quick
Stanley Druckenmiller: [edited] Say you own a 10-year Treasury bond, and you see that one of the interest payments to you, over 10 years, is going to be delayed by two weeks. That is a "default". You have no doubt that you will be paid, but there will be a delay.
In exchange for that delay, you observe massive cuts in entitlements and the implementation of policies which make you much more assured that you will receive your payments 7-10 years in the future.
In the alternate case, the US debt limit is quickly raised to avoid any possible delay in payments. But, the US will continue to pile up trillions of dollars of debt, possibly leading to a Greek situation in 7-10 years.
As an owner or purchaser of that Treasury bond, which scenario do you want? It is a no-brainer. You want default, if that is what it takes to have a sane financial policy.
Bill Quick: Our politicians are determined to drain the credit of the US, and they want to give you the second case. Why would anyone want to own the long-term debt of the United States?
AMG: Our politicians want to avoid any policy decision. They prefer a crushing debt crisis in 10 years, rather than a policy fight now. They intend to max-out the credit card, stopping only when it is cancelled. Beware, long-term credit problems can become short-term without warning as the buyers wise up.
US debt crisis, Default, Debt limit
(M)05/16/11 - Craig Steiner
The same story with some more financial detail
Socialism = GreedFred: Our unions protect the working man ...
Mike: ... by taxing the working men who aren't in the union.
- -
02/21/11 - Roger L. Simon
[edited] Governor Scott Walker followed the voters' wishes. His bill cut government pensions slightly and limited the power of public unions. This would create some equality between increasingly rich public workers and their poorer private sector counterparts.
All Hell broke loose. Some angry demonstrators waved placards identifying their governor with Hitler and Mubarak. Why has our left become so reactionary, so unwilling to adapt that they “act out” like adolescents deprived of the family car keys? Liberalism has become a mask for greed, a way of hiding selfishness from others and from themselves. It’s a deflection.
They hide behind "union", but it’s fake. Modern liberals are overcome by their sense of entitlement. Christopher Lasch’s Culture of Narcissism has infected them, and reality cannot intrude. They want their pension even if there is no money, even when others have to pay for it, others who are broke and without any pension of their own.
Socialism, my fat fanny! It’s just plain old selfish greed.
Leftist Unions Greed
(v)Via Instapundit by Ed Driscoll
Terrorist Nuclear Game TheoryFred: Did you hear this one about a state sponsor of terrorism? It acquired a nuclear weapon and couldn't read the instructions. But, the West thought it had the capability, and wiped out most of that state with tactical nukes.
Mike: That isn't funny.
- -
09/19/03 - Belmont Club by Richard Fernendez
[summary]: The US and Russia had a nuclear standoff. Each wanted defense, not the destruction of the other. In contrast, Islamist terrorists have plainly stated that they will use nuclear and biological weapons against the West if they can acquire them. They want destruction.
If the West knows that terrorists have a WMD, this will trigger preemptive attack by the West. Why wait to be attacked first?
If a terrorist state acquires the ability to manufacture multiple weapons, this may trigger massive preemptive attack. Even one terrorist use of WMD will certainly trigger a massive response aimed at destroying the ability of that state to continue manufacture.
The desire of Muslim states to acquire WMD threatens their survivial. Success would create the conditions which would invite massive attack. Their only hope is that the West will win the war on terrorist groups by eliminating them. Not much hope.
Pakistan terrorism Osama bin Laden nuclear weapons WMD
(M)
05/05/11 - ChicagoBoyz by Trent Telenko
[edited] Osama bin Laden's residence was 800 yards from Pakistan’s West Point. This is clear and convincing evidence that Pakistan sponsors terrorism against America.
Not Questioning Osama Bin LadenFred: The US has issued contradictory stories about how Osama was killed.
Mike: The fog of war.
Fred: The fog of hiding the true story.
- -
05/04/11 - Michael Ledeen
AMG: A few points from Mr. Ledeen's post.
Pakistan was hiding Osama. The Afghan war was going badly for al-Qaeda. Maybe many within AQ wanted to relocate to Egypt, but Osama didn't want to admit defeat. Osama's internal enemies decided to give him up. The Pakistanis agreed, wanting less trouble from Afganistan and assurance that US aid would continue.
The Pakistanis agreed not to interfere, under the assurance that Osama would not be interrogated. No revelations would emerge about the Paks, Zawahiri, the Saudi deals, or about the support for AQ from Assad in Syria. It’s quite a long list. Everyone wanted Osama dead, not interrogated.
This might explain why there are confused stories from the US about why Osama was killed rather than captured. It might explain why US aircraft were not bothered by Pakistan's air defenses, and why no Pakistani military investigated the noisy 45 minute assault while it was happening.
Pakistan, Osama Bin Laden
(M)05/07/11 - PJ Tatler by Michael Ledeen
Did Zawahiri Betray bin Laden?
Ledeen lists the candidates who might have wanted to kill Bin Laden.
(M)05/07/11 - PJ Tatler by Dan Miller
Why not release the order directing action against bin Laden?
[edited] I have not yet seen any specific calls for release of whatever document embodied the Presidential Finding authorizing the operation. Was it done on the basis of President Reagan’s 1986 Presidential Finding? Did President Obama sign a supplemental Memorandum of Notification? When?
There is a claim that “Unlike Clinton and his National Security Advisor, Sandy Berger, Obama actually authorized a strike against bin Laden when given the chance.” If there was no such order, that would be quite interesting.
Medicare Is Lousy InsuranceFred: Don't touch my Medicare. I want the free insurance that I was promised and have paid in to collect.
Mike: Uh, Medicare isn't free, and you need additional private insurance to cover the parts where Medicare is inadequate. I'm sorry you had to pay in for all of those years, but you will keep paying.
- -
05/02/11 - John Goodman on Health Policy
[edited] Most of the elderly hold onto Medicare for dear life because there is nothing else available and they have no basis for comparison. But in fact, Medicare is a lousy insurance program. It would be impossible to sell it on the private market.
ObamaCare supporters point to big co-pays in private coverage, but Medicare has no limit on out-of-pocket spending. Medicare is vastly complicated, enormously expensive to consumers, and massively underfunded.
Medicare Obamacare
(M)California Health Advocates - Medicare Benefits for 2011.
The chart shows all Medicare Part A and B premiums, deductibles, and co-pays. Additional Medigap insurance can cover some of the gaps in coverage and pay for all or part of Medicare co-pays and deductibles, depending on the policy. Some Medicare Advantage plans may help cover these costs.
AMG: Medicare is not free health insurance. It is complicated, with fees, copays, and coverage limits. You need private insurance to cover what is left out of Medicare.
Narratives Misguide Our LivesFred: We must stop using fossil fuels. All of our lives are at stake.
Mike: No problem. We can shut off your electricity tomorrow, and come by next week to collect your automobiles.
- -
04/18/11 - Robert Bidinotto
[edited] Most people are directed by Narratives that are unconscious and never soberly considered.
"Untouched nature is paradise and human choices upset the balance." This Garden of Eden myth leads to Environmentalism.
"We should take from the rich and give to the poor." This modern version of Robin Hood leads to Communism, Socialism, and their Progressive variants.
"David is morally superior to Goliath." This Old Testament story has led to disastrous U.S. foreign policy, blindly aimed at toppling powerful regimes in favor of the "little guy", even if he is a jihadist wearing a suicide vest, and is eager to slaughter us.
Narratives, Philosophy
(v)Via Ed Driscoll
Speculations on OilFred: Obama suspects that speculators are raising the price of oil for all of us.
Mike: Here's an experiment. I'll bet you that eggs will sell for $1.50 /dozen in the supermarket next month. We will be egg speculators, and raise the price of eggs.
Fred: You're nuts. That won't change anything.
Mike: Exactly.
- -
04/22/11 - Powerline by John Hinderaker
[edited] Obama is blaming oil speculators for raising the price of oil. Warren Meyer explains concisely and clearly why this blame is misplaced and itself a fraud.
Meyer: Speculators are supposedly raising the price of oil by buying part of current production and storing it away from the market. Four tankers holding one million barrels each would only store 1% of current inventories, one hour of world oil demand. Someone would have to be buying this amount of oil every day and storing it indefinitely to keep prices elevated.
This would bankrupt anyone in the attempt. Doing this for six months would cost $80 billion just for the oil and would require storage larger than the US strategic petroleum reserve.
AMG: Speculators are betting on changes in the price of oil, but can't be affecting that price. They change the price of oil as much as betting on the Super Bowl changes the outcome of the game.
Oil Price, Speculation
(M)
02/22/11 - Knowledge Problem by Lynne Kiesling
Some links about oil and speculation. I like this statement at Reason:
Matt Welch: Here is federal energy policy: Do nothing significant to increase domestic supply, and create mandates to have XX% of future supply come from magical green leprechauns. When prices go up (surprise!) you know what to do: Blame the “speculators”.
(M)
Profits and Gas Taxes per Gallon
04/27/11 - Carpe Diem by Prof. Mark Perry
According to Exxon Mobil, in the first three months of 2011, each gallon of gasoline, diesel, or finished product sold in the US produced average profits of 7 cents/gallon. Government taxes averaged 48 cents/gallon.
Washing MachinesFred: ( drinking café latté ) We must reduce our energy consumption to about the levels of 1870, or we are all going to die from Global Warming.
Mike: I'm willing to die, if I can have clean clothes in the meantime.
- -
03/30/11 - 03/21 - TED by Hans Rosling - Video 9:15
Electric washing machines are among the most important inventions of the 20th century. They freed immense amounts of time for women to improve themselves and their families. Even hard core environmentalists use washing machines.
Today, 5 billion people out of 7 billion wash their clothes by hand. 2 billion don't have electricity. Shall we deny them their (supposedly harmful) carbon footprint?
Energy, Electricity
(v)Via Cafe Hayek
No Child-Only InsuranceFred: A few weeks ago, I received a letter from the government at my grocery store. It said that henceforth I must give free food to any hungry person who comes into the store.
Mike: How are you handling it?
Fred: I'm out of business. Are you hiring?
- -
03/23/11 - InsureBlog
[edited] The original law on health insurance required an insurer to cover pre-existing conditions for a child if it accepted the application. The insurer could charge a higher rate for a sick child, or it could deny coverage.
HHS Sec. Sebelius decided this was not fair. She prohibited health insurance companies from denying coverage to children.
AMG: Under Sebelius's rule, if an insurer offered child-only insurance, it would have to accept all applications and cover pre-existing conditions. So, all insurers in the U.S. stopped offering child-only coverage. An insurer does not have to accept a child into a plan it does not offer.
Children are still covered as dependents of parents who are accepted for insurance, regardless of the child's pre-existing conditions, at somewhat higher rates overall.
Child Only Insurance
(M)11/20/10 - Easy Opinions
Health Insurance Thirst Mandate
Who pays when the government mandates insurance benefits?
Banana Equivalent DoseFred: Pass me that banana, please.
Mike: No way. I don't have any lead shielding.
- -
03/14/11 - Watts Up With That by Anthony Watts
[edited] Bananas are naturally and particularly radioactive due to their content of potassium-40. The banana equivalent dose is the radiation exposure received by eating a banana. It is a convenient way to judge the practical risks of radiation.
Bananas regularly cause false alarms on sensors used to detect smuggling of nuclear material.
A radiation dose of 10 millirems (1000 bananas) increases your risk of death by one part in one million. That is the same risk as eating 40 tablespoons of peanut butter, or of smoking 1.4 cigarettes.
Radiation, Banana
(v)Instapundit
(M)03/19/11 - XKCD
The little squares show relative radiation doses. Eating one banana is about equal to living for one year within 50 miles of a nuclear power plant.
(v)Via ChicagoBoyz
Economic ArchitectFred: Rebuilding after the earthquake will spur economic activity and give everyone a job.
Mike: Maybe they should destroy the remaining buildings and become rich.
- -
03/11/11 - Knowledge Problem by Lynne Kiesling
[edited] Larry Summers is a Professor of Economics at Harvard. He has been director of President Obama’s economic council and head of the World Bank.
Japan today suffered a devastating earthquake. Summers commented that rebuilding could provide a temporary boost to the Japanese economy. He went further to say that after the Kobe earthquake in 1995, Japan actually gained some economic strength due to the process of reconstruction.
He should be embarrassed to argue that the destruction of real resources can provide economic benefit even temporarily. It is ludicrous for Summers to say that the 1995 earthquate had a long lasting, good effect because of the need to rebuild.
AMG: Read about the Broken Window Fallacy at the link. A broken window seems to create economic opportunity as people find work replacing it. But first someone who had a window must lose it.
Your town cannot become prosperous by breaking all of its windows, then organizing the residents to fix them all.
Summers holds and has held positions of importance and power. Is he more of an economist or a say-anything politician?
Broken Window Fallacy
(M)
02/13/09 - Easy Opinions - Audacity to Do Nothing
The Broken Window Fallacy underlies most government action. Politicians point to the useful things that they are doing, but ignore the costs and disruption of their policies and taxes.
Our prosperous society is built on predictible law and consequences. This is already a shining accomplishment in an uncertain world. It does no good to, in effect, suspend the law and take extraordinary actions because some people made bad bets, lost money, and have political influence.
(M)Russ Roberts is a real economist. He doesn't understand Summer's logic, and provides a few links explaining why.
(M)
Amazing video (5:29) of the tsunami flood and debris moving inland across fields and streets
Socialized Medicine In PracticeCharlie Martin: Canada has the world's most wonderful health care system, except when it is actually you that is sick.
- -
03/09/11 - PJ Tatler by Charlie Martin
[edited]
My distant cousin in Canada had gynecological hemorrhaging. An emergency room physician gave her prompt treatment that stopped the bleeding, and he arranged an emergency appointment for her with a gynecologist.
Being this was an emergency, the appointment was only six weeks in the future. The Gods alone know how long one has to wait for a regular gyn checkup.
If my cousin had been at the Duke Hospital, she would have seen at least a gyn resident before they let her leave.
Canadian patients wait almost twice as long for treatment than is clinically reasonable, almost eighteen weeks between seeing their family physician and receiving treatment from a specialist.
Canada, Socialized Medicine
(v)Via Instapundit
Turning Green Into GreenbacksBob: Conservation. Less carbon. I like Green.
Crony Corporation: Me too. I like the green.
Bob: You know, that is ungrammatical.
Crony Corporation: No, just a different point of view.
- -
03/07/11 - Washington Examiner by Tim Carney
[edited] Environmental policy is not driven by tree-hugging activists, earnest liberal bloggers, or ecologically minded citizens.
Instead, it flows from the lobbyists and executives of multinational corporations and built-for-subsidy startups. They see profit in the loan guarantees, handouts, mandates, and tax credits that Congress creates in the name of saving the planet.
Green Energy, Subsidies
(v)via Don Boudreaux at Cafe Hayek
Less Electricity = Smarter Living Fred: They're predicting a blackout at 7:00.
Jane: I'll heat dinner now and we can eat by flashlight. Are the batteries charged?
- -
03/07/11 - Tatler by Bryan Preston
[edited] Steve Holliday is the CEO of National Grid. He predicts less access to electricity as the UK uses more wind-generated power. Blackouts could be a part of power systems that replace reliable coal plants with wind turbines. Wind power is necessary to meet government requirements, but it will require lifestyle changes.
He means that the UK will get a barely functional, hideously expensive, Third World power grid.
Holliday: We keep thinking that we want electricity to be there when we need it. The grid is going to be much smarter than that in 2020.
The electric utility will decide when and where power should be delivered to meet the highest social purpose, or price power prohibitively for non-essential purposes.
AMG: The "smart grid" will know how to shut off your power to meet the limitations imposed by government. Consume less. Pay more. Save the earth. Will politicians have the same "meter profile" that you do?
Wind Power, Smart Grid, Electricity
(v)Via Instapundit
Spending for the ChildrenCato: We are spending 3 times as much for no gains.
Dems: Clearly, we are not spending enough.
- -
03/07/11 - 02/10/11 - Cato.org by Andrew J. Coulson
Federal Involvement in America's Classrooms
Testimony to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce
[edited] We spent over $151,000 per student sending the graduating class of 2009 through public schools. That is nearly three times as much as we spent on the graduating class of 1970, adjusting for inflation. Despite that massive real spending increase, overall achievement has stagnated or declined, depending on the subject.
Education, Spending
(M)
Should We Spend More on Failed Programs?
03/07/11 - Cato.org by Andrew J. Coulson [edited]
Coulson: I testified before the House Education and Workforce Committee. I reported that our government has spent $2 trillion on K-12 schooling over the past two generations. This failed to achieve either of its goals, to raise overall achievement or to narrow differences in achievement by family income and minority status.
Rep. Miller was the ranking Democrat and prior committee chairman. He said:
"I think when you look at student performance, and you look at money, and you want to say that somehow there should be some correlation there, I think that’s wrong-headed."
Coulson: Really? Democrats support higher government spending than do libertarians and conservatives. But, I always understood that they expected extra spending to actually accomplish something.
I never before heard anyone suggest that we should spend more taxpayer money without any expectation that this will improve outcomes.
Burning Down the HouseDem: Your failed housing policies and lax oversight caused massive corruption and huge losses, creating our financial crisis.
Pub: But, these were your policies. When we tried to stop you, you called us anti-poor and said everything would be fine.
Dem: Pffft! You call yourselves the responsible ones. You should have tried harder to stop us.
- -
03/04/11 - Ed Driscoll
AMG: The new political narrative is that Republicans are trying to take advantage of the economic crisis caused by their failed policies.
Whoa! The housing crisis was caused by government policy, primarily by Democrats. Republicans tried and failed to stop them.
See the links and the video "Burning Down the House" (10:51) which explains the highpoints of the bad policy and its consequences.
Housing Financial Crisis
(M)We Guarantee It
Government Caused the Economic Crisis
10/2008 - Easy Opinions
The government bought bad loans, guaranteed them, pressured bond ratings agencies, and ignored experience, restraint, and regulation. The massive losses of $2 trillion ($2,000 billion) killed our economy.
Analogy to a UnionFred: My union got me $42 per hour plus benefits.
Mike: I would like that job, and would work for less.
Fred: Scab.
Mike: Monopolist.
- -
02/28/11 - Econlog Econlib by David Henderson
[edited] What is the business analogy to a union? An association of airlines could set ticket prices, then vote to force all airlines to charge those prices, including airlines that don't want to join the association. That is monopoly power.
Coercion is the key ingredient. If teachers simply got together to negotiate with school districts, then unions would not be monopolies. Teachers who didn't want to join the union would be free to negotiate their own deals.
Some teachers would accept lower wages than the union wants. Given the typical, tyranical seniority rules of unions, new hires especially might want to negotiate a separate, lower wage.
AMG: A fuzzy idea holds that unions are in competition with employers. Actually, unions restrict competition from other workers. Unions negotiate higher wages for their members only by excluding workers who would demand less.
The bad effect is that fewer people are employed. Higher wages mean higher prices, lower sales, and less overall employment. Is it right that some workers should get a higher wage by excluding others from work?
Unions, Monopoly, Collective Bargaining
(M)
Rich comments: [edited]
I learned last week that my job and 75 others at BLS are going away. The union says that the workers with lowest tenure (not the lowest performance ratings) should be the ones who are dismissed. I am *forbidden* from approaching BLS and offering to take a pay cut in order to retain my job. That is what unionization means in a non-right-to-work state.
A Small Terror ThreatFred: The war on terror has saved lives.
Mike: Probably. But the $2,000 billion cost and lives lost on the battlefield have been too dear. Terrorists do kill people. Balance that against the lives not saved because such resources have been drained away.
- -
02/15/11 - Reason by Shikha Dalmia
[edited] For 10 years since the 9/11 attack, Islamic terrorists have not flown more planes into buildings, detonated nukes or dirty bombs, released nerve gas into subways, poisoned the water supply, or blown up a shopping mall. Should we credit high security, or maybe the Islamists never posed a large, continuing threat?
Al Qaeda can scrape together a team for something spectacular only every decade or so. The average Al Qaeda foot solider is a semi-literate peasant with little contact with the world outside his province. More sophisticated people are hard to find and recruit.
3,000 American dead can't be ignored, even if only once every 10 years. A limited effort to clean out Al Qaeda in Afghanistan might have been justified. But, expenditures of $2 trillion have been foolish. A country sacrifices lives when it ignores bigger threats to fight smaller ones. Over 5,000 American soldiers have died in Afghanistan and Iraq without on balance saving any civilian lives.
Al Qaeda, Terror
(v)Via Schneier on Security
(M)Terrorism is Thug Advertising
03/02/10 - EO → Cato at Liberty by Julian Sanchez
Why do they want to kill us. What is in it for them? They attack us as a way to build their local organizations and street cred.
Economics of SeinfeldFred: Then, George must decide to either visit his parents or go to the party.
Mike: In economics, we would say that the opportunity cost of visiting his parents is a party.
- -
02/20/11 - Yada Yada Yada Econ
[edited] This site uses episodes of the sitcom "Seinfeld" to explain economic concepts. Seinfeld ran for nine seasons as a “show about nothing”, the daily interactions of Jerry, George, Elaine, and Kramer. The simplicity of Seinfeld makes economic concepts come alive and apply to personal experience.
Seinfeld, Economics
(v)Via Mises Institute
Budget DreamsObama: My budget matches government income to spending by mid-decade.
Reporter: But, your budget projections show more than $600 billion of borrowing in every year of the decade.
Obama: Let me be clear. We might have to do more.
- -
02/15/11 - Powerline by John Hinderaker
AMG: This is an edited, recombined excerpt of Obama's press conference about the budget he has presented.
Obama: When I took office, I pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term. Our budget puts us on a path to pay for what we spend. By the middle of this decade, our annual spending will match our annual revenues. We will not be adding more to the national debt. We're not going to be running up the credit card anymore.
Reporter: I'm sure you've read page 171, the central page of your budget. The deficits go from $1.1 trillion down to $768 billion, then down to $607 billion in 2015. Then they creep up to $774 billion yearly by 2021.
The total over those 10 years is $7.2 trillion in additional borrowing, on top of the $14 trillion we have now. How can you say that we are living within our means?
Obama: Well -- let me be clear on what I'm saying, because I'm not suggesting that we don't have to do more. [Then, 286 more words, but no answer.]
- -
AMG: Obama's statement seems more like a delusion or ignorance than a lie. No one would lie about the plain figures which his own team has released.
Obama, Budget
(M)
02/16/11 - PowerLine by John Hinderaker [edited]
Jake Tapper - White House reporter: Obama said "We will not be adding more to the national debt." Does that statement stand to scrutiny?
Jay Carney - Obama's Press Secretary: Absolutely, absolutely. And Jake, we have explained precisely what that means in terms of new spending, getting our income and spending into balance. That is an important step towards dealing with our deficit and our debt.
Hinderaker: So it wasn't just Obama having a bizarrely bad day. His administration really is trying to fool the public by running away from its own budget
Intellectualist AchievementsIntellectualist: I understand and process nuances which are far beyond your training and perception.
Realist: It seems that my imagination is limited by reality.
- -
02/09/11 - Economist Thomas Sowell
[edited] Intellectuals encourage people who contribute nothing to the world to complain and organize protests, because others are not doing enough for them.
They have rationalized law breaking by those who picture themselves as underdogs fighting an oppressive “system,” even when these are college students from affluent homes.
The intelligentsia have changed the role of education, from giving students the knowledge and intellectual skills to make up their own minds, into a process of indoctrination into the beliefs of the anointed.
They say two groups of people are equally deserving. Those whose work creates the goods and services that sustain a rising standard of living, and those who refuse to work but who are nevertheless entitled to their “fair share” of what others have created.
They have filtered information in the media, schools, and in academia to leave out things that threaten their vision of the world.
Intellectuals, Thomas Sowell
(v)Via ChicagoBoyz by Shannon Love
Private Beats Public in SwedenFred: I don't like the idea of school administrators working for a profit.
Mike: We pay a lot to boards of education, superintendents, and a state bureaucracy. What are they working for?
Fred: They make salaries, not profits.
- -
02/07/11 - Cato by Andrew J. Coulson
[edited] Swedish non-profit and for-profit private schools both outperform state schools by about the same margin. The difference is response to growing demand. The non-profits have lengthened their waiting lists. The for-profits have expanded.
AMG: The for-profit schools have the incentive and direct funding to expand their services. The non-profits may have the desire, but their funding requires political action. Which pattern do you want for your children and grandchildren?
From the study:
• For-profit schools benefit all students, especially the less privileged.
• Competition has improved conditions for teachers and has increased educational achievement.
• Independent ("free") schools satisfy parents more than government schools.
• The profit motive attracts entrepreneurs to start schools and expand enrollment. Banning for-profit schools may dramatically reduce the number of independent schools that are created. This would limit the benefits of competition.
Non-Profit Schools, Sweden
(M)12/2010 - Swedish Education Reform and Profit Motive (PDF)
Cracking the Scratch LotteryFred: People may be scamming the lottery. Perfectly legal.
Mike: Isn't that true for most of government?
- -
02/05/11 - Wired by Jonah Lehrer
[edited]
A statistician Mohan Srivastava became interested in "baited" scratch lottery tickets. The buyer matches the scratched-off numbers against a set of Tic-Tac-Toe boards, increasing his anticipation and making the process more fun.
There was enough information in the displayed boards to choose winning tickets 90% of the time before scratching the hidden numbers.
AMG: You may care, because some people may be finding the winners, while you buy the losers. I see an analogy to all of government.
Scratch Ticket Lottery
(v)Via Knowledge Problem
Crying Over Spilled MilkFred: The EPA blew it handling the BP oil spill. They were a disorganized bureaucracy.
Mike: Well, they are going to regain their reputation by showing how well they handle spilled milk.
- -
02/01/11 - Washington Examiner by Thomas Sowell
[edited]
Any power given to a bureaucracy can be stretched far beyond the original purpose.
In a classic example, the EPA has noticed that milk contains oil. It has asserted the authority to apply new regulations on dairy farmers. They must file "emergency management" plans to show how they will cope with spilled milk, how they will train "first responders", and build "containment facilities" if there is a flood of spilled milk.
People and businesses compare benefits against costs. Only in government is any benefit, however small, considered to be worth any regulatory cost, however large.
The claim is that this will "create jobs," but the tax money removed from the private sector correspondingly reduces the jobs available there.
AMG: You might think that the useless costs imposed on dairy farmers do not concern you. Actually, businesses organize work and production, they do not ultimately pay for them. The consumer will pay the extra costs that the EPA will impose on dairy farmers. Competition will not bring the price of milk back down when all dairy farmers must pay these costs and many small operations are forced to close.
Regulation, Spilled Milk
(M)
EPA Purity of Essence
06/21/10 - Easy Opinions
Government regulation and preparation failed in the very important case of the BP gulf oil spill. This has produced a strong reaction to other, simpler, unnecessary cases as a demonstration that the regulators are really vigilant and powerful. Take that, you dairy farmers!
(v)Via Protein Wisdom
Roman TimesFred: Our wealth gives gives us the responsibility to help the poor.
Mike: You mean the wealth I worked for, and you mean the poor who can vote for you. How did "we" become wealthy?
Fred: Lucky, I guess.
- -
1/31/11 - 07/02/10 - Bill Whittle
[edited] The Roman orator Cicero spoke in 55 BC: “Gaius Gracchus proposed a grain law. The people were delighted because it provided an abundance of food without work. The good men fought against it, because they thought the masses would be attracted away from hard work and toward idleness. They saw that the state treasury would be exhausted.”
Whittle: Our society has become prosperous after generations of hard work, sacrifice, and hardship. Progressives like Bill Maher, Janeane Garofolo, Rosie O’Donnell, and Gaius Gracchus (dead in 121 BC) assume that this prosperity is endless. They push for more people to get more goods and services for less work.
The motivation for Progressives is the same in America today as it was in the British, French, and Spanish Empires, as for the Ottomans, the Mongols, Rome, Greece, Eqypt, and Babylon. They do it for political power. They live for political power. Progressivism is ancient, recurring, tyrannical, and ruinous.
Progressive Ideas, Roman Empire
(v)Via Ed Driscoll
Squeezing the Middle ClassFred: We must empower the government to make the rich pay.
Mike: I suspect that they aren't the only ones paying.
- -
01/30/11 - Lonely Conservative
A reader [edited]:
I watch countless news stories about illegal aliens, felons, liars, cheats, and the plain stupid getting help with their mortgage loans because they “need it”. People get free medical services because they “need it”. People “need to” declare bankruptcy because it’s just too hard to pay the bills.
All the while, my government crushes people like me, expecting us to just keep doing, just keep paying, just keep being responsible to make up for all of those people who were not.
This President and this Administration have done their best to ignite class warfare and warfare between the “differences” in America. They’ve done a great job. I resent the wealthy, I resent illegal aliens, I resent the professional victim class, I resent being told to keep my skin in the game so they can continue to ruin every possibility of happiness for me.
AMG: Every government action to help people "in need" takes resources from people who work to produce value in life. Much is taken from the wealthy, but most is taken in silent ways from the middle class. The government is not a careful charity, and doesn't mind giving handouts to anyone who votes.
Charity is noble. A government playing Mother Theresa With a Gun is not.
Charity, Middle Class Squeeze
(v)Via Instapundit
What Ends a Political Career?Fred: Palin is a witch who should burn for her outrageous tone and use of violent imagery.
Mike: Are you making threats?
Fred: Get off my back. It's a metaphor.
- -
01/15/11 - Hot Air by Laura Curtis
[edited] The MSNBC brain trust has declared that Sarah Palin's political career is over. Her crime was to answer the utterly false accusation that she encouraged murder through political symbols. They say Sarah Palin is now vanquished, the public trust has been restored, and we can all rest easy.
Consider what does not end the political career of a liberal figure favored by the mainstream press. Here are 12 situations where all has been forgiven.
Political Career
(v)Via Instapundit
Reducing Carbon Emissions is Utterly FutileEnviro: We have to stop putting CO2 into the atmosphere. No more fossil fuels!
Mike: If we stopped all use of fossil fuels, or captured all man-made CO2, we would lower world temperatures by at most 0.14 °F.
Enviro: OK, that's a start.
- -
12/29/10 - Pajamas Media by Art Horn [edited]
Reducing industrial emissions of carbon dioxide is utterly pointless for changing climate. It only makes sense if you want to:
Profit from trading carbon credits
Control energy sources
Save the world from capitalists
Extract money from developed nations and give it to poorer ones
Promote [politically subsidized] environmental corporations by making current energy very expensive.
Water vapor and clouds produce about 90% of the greenhouse effect, carbon dioxide 8%, nitrous oxide 0.95% and methane 0.36%. The combined greenhouse effect raises Earth's average temperature from 0 °F up to 59 °F. We need it.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment (IPPC) shows that 3% of yearly CO2 emissions into the atmosphere comes from burning fossil fuels. So, the human component of the [change in the] greenhouse effect is at most 0.24% (3% of the 8% carbon dioxide component).
AMG: Say we stopped all burning of fossil fuels worldwide. We would lower the greenhouse effect by at most .0024 x 59 °F = 0.14 °F.
Greenhouse Effect, Global Warming
(v)Via Instapundit
(M)12/30/10 - National Review
A graph of past temperatures from atmosphere isotope concentrations in ice cores. This puts our current relatively cold climate in perspective. For example, the Romans lived in much warmer times, and seemed to enjoy it immensely.
(v)via Ed Driscoll
(M)12/29/10 - Watts Up With That
Nice charts compare current global temperature to past data. Isotope data is more reliable than looking at how old trees did or didn't grow in Siberia near the arctic circle.
Truth About Political LiesPolitician: I'm out of politics now. I can admit that I lied.
Reporter: What did you lie about?
Politician: Everything.
- -
10/25/10 - Ed Driscoll → Jerry Brown
AMG: A younger Jerry Brown finished his term as governor of California, and decided to tell the truth. Brown vigorously proclaims in a 35 second video clip that he lied about having plans to improve California. He says other big politicians are lying too, "Get real".
This shouldn't be news to anyone. Still, it is remarkable to hear a politician telling the direct truth.
Lies, Politics, Jerry Brown
(M)10/2008 - EO → Tell Me About the Past
There is only one way to deal with the promises and statements of politicians. Ignore most of them. Forget about statements of a glorious future based on good feelings.
We should think of politicians as construction contractors. We don't need statements like "it will be the best building you could imagine". We do need blueprints and references. Has he built similar buildings? How did they turn out?
Sicko showed mythical Cuban healthcareFred: Sicko showed one of the few good hospitals in Cuba.
Mike: That hospital exists; it isn't mythical.
Fred: Only the rich or important can go there.
Mike: Says who?
Fred: The Cuban government.
Mike: They are probably lying.
- -
12/17/10 - EasyOpinions -> Guardian UK
[edited] Sicko is Michael Moore's 2007 documentary. It compared US healthcare to the supposed excellence of the socialist Cuban system.
WikiLeaks has revealed a confidential US cable. Cuban authorities criticized the film for painting a mythically favourable picture of Cuba's healthcare. They feared a popular backlash from showing facilities that are not available to the vast majority of Cubans.
Cuba, Healthcare, Michael Moore
(M)12/28/10 - PowerLine Blog
Scott Johnson describes a recent, naive PBS story, and collects accounts of how terrible Cuban healthcare really is.
Jay Nordlinger: A nurse spoke to Isabel Vincent of Canada's National Post. "We have nothing. I haven't seen aspirin in a Cuban store for more than a year. If you have any pills in your purse, I'll take them. Even if they have passed their expiry date."
The Edited Sarah PalinReporter: What is your position on taxes?
Candidate Mike: Taxes are ridiculous, considering the complexity and arbitrary enforcement of the tax laws. We need simplification and reform.
As Reported: Candidate Mike's position on taxes is "Taxes are ridiculous".
- -
12/11/10 - Ed Driscoll at PajamasMedia
Noel Sheppard at NewsBusters [edited].
In the 2008 presidential campaign, Katie Couric asked Sarah Palin what books and newspapers she read. Palin was ridiculed for not supplying a specific list [to a demeaning question -amg].
Barbara Walters on Friday asked the same question. Mark Levin noted that Palin's response was edited to remove mention of his book “Liberty and Tyranny”. (Audio at the link).
09/14/08 - Robert Bidinotto of Men’s News Daily called out infractions at ABC [edited]:
A public challenge to Charles Gibson. Asking tough questions is fine. What I find outrageous is the editing of many of Palin’s responses in broadcasts over several days. ABC distorted excerpts from the Palin interview, giving false impressions about Palin’s views, intellect, responsiveness, and honesty.
1. The editors almost always selected fragments of Palin's responses, sometimes cutting her off in mid-sentence. This often gave a false impression about her responsiveness, knowledge, and the nuances of her positions.
2. The editors presented different replies to the same questions. On one show, a fragment might be terse, incomplete, and off-point, presenting Palin as foolish or evasive. A different show would present a response to the same question that was thoughtful and on-point.
Such editing is non-objective and dishonest.
Sarah Palin, News bias
(M)
02/10/11 - Powerline by John Hinderaker [edited]
This is a funny example of liberal bias. US Weekly mistook a satire for the real thing. Their headline was "Sarah Palin Slams 'Airhead Diva' Christina Aguilera for Anthem Flub."
How dumb [or biased] do you have to be to believe broad satire? That is what makes liberalism such a formidable adversary. It is backed by one of the world's most powerful forces, stupidity.
The EMTALA ParadoxFred: I'm so sick. I need a doctor.
MedClerk: I will be your clerk today. Here is an aspirin, and a thermometer for you to take your temperature. Don't lose it. There are no doctors here.
Fred: I really need a doctor.
MedClerk: Don't worry. I will record your symptoms and look up your treatment in the book. We find that this resolves over 40% of client needs at little public expense.
Fred: I was looking for a doctor.
MedClerk: Stop complaining. This is all free.
- -
12/05/10 - Feb 03 - Emergency Medicine News
[edited excerpt] The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) is diminishing the access it was intended to promote.
Congress enacted EMTALA in 1986 and expanded the law five times, often without clear guidance. It has been a massive regulatory burden for already overwhelmed hospitals and physicians.
Since enactment, US emergency visits surged from 85 to 110 million yearly. But, more than 550 hospitals, 1,100 emergency departments (EDs), many trauma centers, maternity wards, and tertiary referral centers have closed. 90% of hospitals have saturated their capacity for treating patients.
EMTALA requires EDs to provide care to everyone, but does not pay for that care. Many specialists avoid on-call duty because they are not paid. They drop their hospital privileges or operate exclusively in their offices or ambulatory surgery centers.
The government's solution is all stick and no carrot. There is no incentive to participate in what is a nationalized health system. EDs are increasingly unable to provide specialty medical care to all of their patients.
AMG: This terrible medical law has been in place since 1986 without rational correction. This is the model for ObamaCare. Mandate care for everyone. When the doctors won't work without pay, blame them for limited services. Motto: "We have a vision of care for everyone. We are good, but they are not, so don't blame us".
EMTALA, ER, Emergemcy Medicine
(v)
EMTALA Sucks but Obamacare Will be Great
12/04/10 - M.D.O.D by 911Doc
Stimulus Doesn't Stimulate - 2Company: Congratulations. We are giving you a $500 repay-bonus. It is real money to spend this holiday season. Then, in a while, you will be required to pay it back.
Fred: Is that supposed to be stimulating?
- -
12/02/10 - 01/06/10 - Washington Examiner by Mark Tapscott [edited]
1930s New Deal lawmakers doubled federal spending. More than 20% unemployment remained until World War II.
Japan passed 10 stimulus bills in 8 years, acquiring huge debt and a stagnant economy.
President Bush in 2001 "injected" one-time tax rebates into the recession. The economy only responded to tax rate reductions two years later.
President Bush in 2008 tried one-time tax rebates. The recession worsened.
A recent $787 billion stimulus was designed to keep unemployment below 8%. It topped 10% in November.
Brian M. Riedl at the Heritage Foundation studied government spending programs. They have never stimulated sustained economic growth.
Government stimulus spending is based on fundamentally flawed Keynesian economic theory. Each dollar of government spending does not create $1.50 of new "economic activity" [whatever that means -ag].
A record $1.2 trillion in deficit spending began in Oct 2008 at the start of FY 2009 (10/01/08 to 09/30/09). That alone should have overheated the economy. Later, the stimulus added $200 billion.
The economy shrank -2.3% in FY 2009, despite the historic 7% increase in deficit spending. [I would say because of the massive borrowing. -ag]
Stimulus, Keynes
(M)Why Government Spending Does Not Stimulate Economic Growth: Answering the Critics
01/05/10 by Brian Riedl [edited]
If Congress funds new spending with taxes, it is only redistributing existing purchasing power, while decreasing incentives to produce.
If Congress borrows the money from domestic investors, those investors will have that much less to invest or to spend in the private economy.
If Congress borrows the money from foreigners, the balance of payments will adjust by equally raising net imports, leaving total domestic demand and output unchanged.
Congress cannot create new purchasing power out of thin air. Every dollar Congress spends must first come from somewhere else.
(M)EO: The Myth of the Economic Multiplier
The "multiplier" from government taxes and spending is less than 1. The government wastes resources collecting more tax, and the citizen wastes resources trying to minimize his tax. Then, the government spends the revenue wastefully, achieving less production of useful goods and services than the citizen would have created through careful purchases and investment.
A "spending multiplier" is absurd. If government spending of $100 creates $150 in wealth, then why doesn't this apply to all spending? The $50 you spend for groceries should produce $75 in wealth. In fact, all money spent each day should produce wealth of 1.5 times the current day's spending, sometime in the near future. This would lead to a wealth explosion, as total wealth increased by 50% every few months. Heck, even if it increased by 5% every few months.
Soviet Economics in MedicareBoard Chair: Category 126. Exploratory and corrective surgeries of the abdomen without complication. There are 213 procedures. Do you have the price tables for this?
Apparatchik: Yes, but some of them may be ...
Board Chair: Accepted. Let's move along. We have 67 more categories to consider today.
- -
11/02/10 - Road to Hellth
[edited] The convoluted process setting medical prices is not economically accurate, and there are many non-medical incentives to recommend one procedure over another. Government officials accuse doctors of pushing expensive procedures over less expensive ones. They are tacitly admitting that the price setting committees are wrong, and wrong from the beginning twenty years ago.
Clinical experience shows that many of those prices are idiotic. We can blame the committees, but they have a complex, expensive, and even impossible task. Bad prices are harmful. A price-fixing system is virtually guaranteed to misallocate scarce medical resources.
Our Republican and Democratic governments deliberately preserve a price-fixing system that wastes time and money and jeopardizes the lives and health of all Americans. Our Leaders passed a healthcare reform bill that turns the medical world upside down, but preserves this method of pricing.
The only plausible explanation is the same one that applies to China, Cuba, North Korea, and the old Soviet Union. They want raw political power over this part of the economy.
Medicare, Medical Prices
(M)
EO - The Medicare Tomato Market
An explanation of Medicare economics by analogy. Say that tomatoes were declared vital to life and made available free through the Medicare National Tomato Bank. This translates the story of healthcare to the tomato market.
Why more taxes for Obama?11/05/10 - Quip
Everything Obama proposes is supposed to save money. Why would he need higher taxes on anyone?
Quip, Obama, Taxes
Don't Envy the Ivy SchoolsAdmissions Officer: Congratulations on being admitted to Harvard.
Mike: I am honored to do my partying at one of the finest schools in the country.
- -
10/10/10 - Washington Post by Jay Mathews [edited]
The Ivy League and other top colleges add no discernable value to the lives of their graduates. They attract students with strengths such as persistence and humor that lead to success. Applicants with such qualities do just as well in life attending schools like Boise State.
There is research on this by economists Alan B. Krueger and Stacy Berg Dale. And, there is now the movie The Social Network. None of the student characters ever study, or even talk about their courses. They talk mostly about sex, parties, and becoming important. Zuckerberg, his friends, and enemies, live on the Web. That Gov 10 paper due Friday is ignored.
That is an exaggeration, but not by much. The atmosphere is similar to what you find at most colleges. The college years are for trying out new stuff. Undergraduates devote little time to absorbing academic riches.
What about those great Ivy alumni contacts? Every college has influential alumni, if you bother to call them. The Zuckerberg character becomes a billionaire not because he went to Harvard, but because he was a computer genius, a talent he developed before he went to college.
College
(v)Via Instapundit
(M)Who Needs Harvard?
10/12/10 - Brookings.edu by Gregg Easterbrook
[edited] Were the kids who got into Yale simply more talented or hardworking than those who got into Tulane? Krueger and Dale studied what happened to students who were accepted at an Ivy school, but chose instead to attend a less sexy, "moderately selective" school.
Students bright enough to win admission to a top school had about the same incomes 20 years later no matter which type of college they attended. The student was responsible for the success, not the school.
Over Spending or Under Taxing?Staffer: Ending the Bush "tax cuts" (raising rates from where they are now) will raise revenue. We would get 2% more from "the rich", and could get 7% more from the middle class. Is it worth it?
Senator: Definitely. That last 2% is where all the fun is. And I can only dream of 7%. But, we can get more from the middle class without being so obvious.
- -
10/08/10 - The American by Veronique de Rugy
[edited] The Congressional Budget Office reports that extending current tax rates ("tax cuts") for top earners would forgo additional tax collections of $700 billion over ten years ($70 billion per year). Extending the tax rates on the middle class would forgo additional tax collections of $3,000 billion over ten years.
Government officials put it this way. Extending the tax cuts (current rates) would cost the government $3.7 trillion over ten years. This sounds like a lot until you compare it to how much the federal government plans/wants to spend during those ten years.
AMG: There is a nice chart of expected spending and possible "tax cuts" (forgone tax increases) projected over the next 10 years, in $billions.
Gov't Spending $41,911 100.0%
Interest on Debt $ 4,527 10.8%
Middle Class "Cut" $ 3,000 7.2%
Upper Class "Cut" $ 700 1.7%
Economic policy, Taxes
(M)EO: The Deadweight Loss of Taxes
The deadweight loss caused by increasing tax rates above current levels may exceed $2 per $1 of revenue increase. That is, when the government collects $1 more in taxes, the economy loses $2 in production and jobs.
(v)Via Cato@Liberty
James Madison on Our RecessionFred: How can I plan or invest when the law is so vague and huge?
Elite: Just do what you were going to do. We'll fine you when you go wrong.
- -
10/07/10 - Clayton Cramer's Blog
[edited excerpts] James Madison was a Founding Father of the US. In 1788 he wrote Federalist No.62 about the effect of bad law on the people, their freedom, and their investment in the future.
About the 2700 page health care bill:
It won't matter that the laws are made by men chosen by the people, if the laws be so voluminous or incoherent that they cannot be read or understood; if the laws be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man can guess what they will be tomorrow.
Why George Soros supports Democrats:
Public instability gives an unreasonable advantage to the sagacious, the enterprising, and the moneyed few over the industrious mass of the people. Every new regulation concerning commerce, revenue, or property presents a new harvest to those who watch the change, and can trace its consequences. Such laws are made for the few, not for the many.
Why employers won't hire right now:
What prudent merchant will risk his fortunes in new commerce when his plans may be rendered unlawful before they can be executed? What farmer or manufacturer will invest if he may be a victim to an inconstant government?
AMG: Government, political tricks, and the desire for power have not changed much in 222 years.
Federalist, Regime uncertainty, Rule of Law
(v)Via Instapundit
The Muslim BrotherhoodFred: What is the true meaning of Muslim "jihad".
Mike: I think we are going to find out.
- -
10/07/10 - Power Line → RubinReports
[edited] The Muslim Brotherhood has one hundred times more activists than al-Qaeda. Barry Rubin reports that it issued its declaration of war last month endorsing anti-American jihad and much of the rest of al-Qaeda's dogma.
Supreme Guide Muhammad Badi: All Muslims are required by their religion to fight: They must understand that the improvement and change that the [Muslim] nation seeks can only be attained through jihad and sacrifice. We must raise a jihadi generation that pursues death just as the enemies pursue life.
Rubin: Notice that jihad here is not interpreted as spiritual striving. The clear meaning is one of armed struggle.
Muslim Brotherhood
(M)
10/10/10 - The Rubin Report by Barry Rubin
[edited] This is one of those obscure Middle East events of the utmost significance that is ignored by the Western mass media because it is in Arabic; ignored by Western governments because it doesn't fit their policies; and ignored by experts because it doesn't mesh with their preconceptions.
This explicit formulation of a revolutionary program makes it a game changer. It should be read by every Western decisionmaker and have a direct effect on policy. It may affect people’s lives in every Western country.
Global Warming Hoax SummaryFred: Your barbeque parties are adding to global warming.
Mike: I only have them in the Summer, when it won't matter so much compared to the Sun.
- -
10/03/10 - Powerline → SEPP
[edited partial summary] Dr. Harrison Schmitt at SEPP: Policy makers in the United States and elsewhere proclaim that human use of fossil fuels accelerates global warming. They want to impose ever greater and clearly unconstitutional control on the economy and personal liberty in the service of omnipotent government.
Global surface temperature has increased .9 degees F each 100 years for the last 350 years. Observed data strongly indicate that this is a natural variation. Burning fossil fuels remains a minor factor, if even detectable.
Climate change is natural and driven by the Sun. The orbital position of the Earth and the Sun's variable influence and activity (sunspots) determine weather and climate.
Empirically, Earth's temperatures correlate closely with solar activity. They correlate hardly at all with the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, which has varied widely over geologic history.
Sun, Climate Change, Global Warming
(M)10/02/10 - SEPP Newsletter (pdf)
Look for Dr. Harrison “Jack” Schmitt
Why Stimulus Doesn't StimulateFred: We will all have jobs soon. The government is spending more on everything.
Mike: Who is going to do the hiring? I'm investing less in everything.
- -
10/01/10 - Sacramento Bee by economist Ribert Higgs
[edited] Team Obama theorizes that additional government spending (demand) will cause businesses to boost production, add jobs, and trigger additional consumer spending that will ripple through the economy for a stronger overall recovery.
Yes, consumer spending is about 70% of America's gross domestic product, and an increase in consumer spending would provide an immediate boost. But, consumer spending increased slightly as a percentage of GDP during the downturn.
There was no decline in consumer spending, so what caused the downturn? Answer: a sharp decline in private investment.
To revive investment, the government needs to stop threatening the profits from investment and remove the regulation and uncertainty that paralyzes new, long-term projects.
Stimulus
(M)06/26/10 - Easy Opinions - DIY Stimulus Policy
Don't be afraid of a few equations. They are only addition. You too can do economics on a cocktail napkin, just like the guys from Harvard Business School.
(v)Via Cafe Hayek
Berwick - New Doctor-Patient RelationshipMike: What treatment will I have?
Assigned Doctor: There is no need to bother you with the details. Rest assured that it balances your needs against those of Society and the limited resources available.
- -
09/24/10 - Retired Doc
[edited] Dr. Don Berwick is Obama's new Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CMS delivers care to 1/3rd of Americans. He wrote about changing the doctor-patient relationship in his book "New Rules", co-authored by Dr. Troyen A. Brennan.
[edited] “Today, this isolated relationship is no longer possible. Traditional medical ethics is based on the doctor-patient dyad. Ethics must be reformulated to fit the new mode of health care delivery. Regulation must evolve. Improved medical care involves designing appropriate rules with authority. Health care is being rationalized through critical pathways and guidelines. The primary function of regulation in health care, especially as it affects the quality of medical care, is to constrain decentralized, individualized decision making.”
Dr. Brennan was chairman of the Professionalism project, which implores physicians to balance their duty to the patient against their nebulous responsibilities to take proper care of society's limited medical resources and strive for social justice.
ObamaCare, CMS, Medicare, Medicaid
(M)
07/07/10 - Verum Serum
Socialist Dr. Berwick Gets Recess Appointment.
Dr. Berwick: "I cannot believe that the individual health care consumer can enforce through choice the proper configurations of a system as massive and complex as health care. That is for leaders to do."
"You plan the supply. You aim a bit low. Historically, you prefer slightly too little of a technology or service to much too much. Then, you search for care bottlenecks, and try to relieve them."
Legitimate State ViolenceFred: The city council is asking for donations to build a new park.
Mike: Why are you pointing a gun at me?
Fred: I thought it would put you in a more generous mood.
- -
09/24/10 - National Review by Kevin D. Williamson [edited]
It is reasonable to shove a gun in someone's face to stop murder, rape, or robbery. It is entirely unreasonable to extort money to study monkeys high on cocaine. It is illegitimate for government to use force or the threat of force for projects that are not inherently public in character.
This useful distinction is not a figure of speech. A project is a legitimate concern of the state only if you are willing to haul off someone at gunpoint because of it.
State violence
(v)Via Instapundit
(M)
10/23/10 - WiselyManaged
The right way to think about taxes
[edited] Pick a friend or neighbor who you like. Call him Steve. Pick a government provided service.
Would you put Steve in jail if he refused to help pay for that service? That is the proper way to view taxes and government spending, because that is precisely how things function. Do you see why this works only if you like Steve?
Denmark's Wind PowerFred: Denmark has more wind power than anyone else.
Mike: And higher rates. And bigger taxpayer subsidies. And we sell most of the wind power to the Germans.
Fred: You always worry about the downside.
- -
09/12/10 - Telegraph UK by Andrew Gilligan
[edited]
Denmark has more than four thousand onshore wind turbines, 65% more than Britain in a country 1/5th the size, and is a global centre of wind turbine manufacturing. Unfortunately, due in part to subsidies, Danes pay twice the energy tariffs as in Britain. Now, public pressure on the Left Party is curbing the handouts.
"There is an outbreak of realism. Wind is not bad, it is just a lot more limited than people thought." UN efforts to create a general climate deal collapsed in acrimony last year. Denmark is puncturing the greens' wilder hopes.
Wind's key disadvantage is unpredictability and uncontrollability. Mostly, the wind does not blow at the right speed, and often at night when little electricity is needed. So, most of Denmark's wind electricity has to be exported to Germany.
Wind power
(v)Via Don Surber
Obama's Old Fashioned Central PlanningAsst. Director: Controlling hundreds of millions of medical interactions is an almost impossible task.
Chief Director: Not to worry. We have the time, the tax revenue, and the bureaucracy to give the people what they deserve. We'll get it right, eventually. I love working for the good of Man/Woman'kind.
- -
09/10/10 - Heritage.org by John S. Hoff, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Planning in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from 2001 to 2005.
[edited] The government presumes that it can and must control the details of health care financing and delivery across the country. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA or ObamaCare) gives the Administration extensive authority to achieve broadly outlined goals, to control every aspect of health care.
Volumes of complex regulations will bureaucratize and politicize health care from a central authority. This will reduce flexibility and deny Americans their own choices. Americans will obtain the health insurance and health care deemed best by the federal government.
PPACA promises to increase the cost of health care, reduce its flexibility, and ultimately prove anathema to the kind of health care that Americans want.
AMG: This paper sumarizes what ObamaCare requires. It is medium long, an indication of the complexity and control the US goverment has imposed upon its citizens.
ObamaCare, PPACA
(v)Via Instapundit
(v)Via Washington Examiner - Michael Barone
Docs 4 Patient Care09/02/10 - AdviceGoddess by Amy Alkon
[edited] Dr. Hal Scherz is a pediatric urological surgeon on faculty at Emory Medical School. He founded Docs4PatientCare.org.
Scherz: Section 1311 of ObamaCare empowers the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish care requirements that your doctor must follow, subject to penalties and fines. This effectively makes doctors into government employees. You and your doctor are no longer in charge of your health care decisions. ObamaCare politicizes medicine and destroys the doctor-patient relationship that makes the American health care system the best in the world.
ObamaCare will badly worsen the current doctor shortage and will bring large cost increases, rising insurance premiums, higher taxes, a decline in new medical techniques, reduced development of miracle drugs, and rationing by government panels.
Bureaucrat Dr. Donald Berwick is a passionate advocate of rationing, which will bring delays of months and sometimes years for hospitalization and surgery.
Some Democratic candidates are making a cosmetic retreat in response to voter anger. They are calling for minor modifications or pretending they are opposed to government-run medicine. But, they will vote with their party after the election, against repealing Obamacare.
Unless the Democratic party receives a strong negative message about this power grab, our health care system will never be fixed and the doctor patient relationship will be ruined forever.
ObamaCare, Docs4PatientCare
(M)
The mission of Docs4PatientCare [edited].
We are an organization of concerned physicians committed to establish a health care system that preserves the doctor-patient relationship, promotes quality of care, supports affordable access to all Americans, and protects patients' freedom of choice.
We urge patients and physicians to get involved and preserve the good qualities of our healthcare system, address the problems, and prevent its bureaucratic destruction.
The AMA has become increasingly politicized in recent years. It's leadership has moved to the left. Docs4PatientCare is challenging the AMA’s stranglehold on health care matters. We stand with other anti-statist groups that oppose the Obama-Reid-Pelosi agenda.
Cash for Clunkers Folly09/01/10 - Boston.com by Jeff Jacoby
[edited] Prices for used cars are up 10% from last year, partly from increased demand for used vehicles in a poor economy.
A bigger reason is that the supply of used cars is artificially low because of the government's hare-brained Car Allowance Rebate System, "Cash for Clunkers".
The government paid up to $4,500 to subsidize trading in an old car and buying a new one with better gas mileage. The trade-in had to be driveable. Then, dealers had to chemically wreck the engine and crush the body. This destroyed hundreds of thousands of good automobiles.
Congress and Obama claimed "success beyond anybody’s imagination." Yes, if success is giving out money to buy a car most people would buy anyway, and wiping out productive assets that could provide value to other consumers.
The environmental benefits cost $237 per ton of reduced carbon emissions, compared to $20 per ton in the carbon offset market.
AMG: This was an expensive stunt, not a careful, thought out, efficient plan.
Clunkers
(v)Via Cafe Hayek
(M)07/2009 - Easy Opinions - A Few Words About Policy
How do our representatives know that their legislation will help, or solve anything? The legislative language is less important than the research showing that the legislation will be of good effect. Where are the research papers that support the bills? This research has to be there. We need to see it.
The Bedbug War08/31/10 - 2/13/06 - TheBedbugWar by Mike David
[edited]
Bedbug bites often follow a distinctive pattern of three bites in a line. I indeed had bedbugs.
I realized I might need professional intervention over a long time. Naturally as a guy, I want to tackle this myself. If we can't spray DDT all over the house, this won't go away easily, regardless of professional help. With a new house and new payments, I can't afford to pay people to spray pesticides that I can buy at the store and spray myself.
The War starts now.
bedbugs
(M)Pest Control Canada - Bed Bugs
* Eradication requires persistence.
* They hide in extremely small, thin cracks. It is hard to find breeding sites. * They avoid daylight, emerging at night.
* They pierce the skin to feed on blood, but can hide a year without feeding. * The bites vary among individuals, from no reaction to severe skin inflammation. * Females lay 300 eggs which hatch in 10 days. * They travel in suitcases, clothing, vehicles, aircraft, and cruise ships.
AMG: There is much more information.
(M)07/02/10 - Megan McArdle - Comment by David Vandagriff
I dismantled my bedroom, washed all fabrics and dried pillows hot for 3 hours. Bedroom stuff first went into plastic bags to avoid spreading the bugs. The mattress and box springs went into insect-proof coverings to starve the bugs.
I used a $70 steam sprayer to treat baseboards, between baseboards and carpet, behind and under bedspreads, and all other nooks and crannies. I sealed the room and used a bed bug bomb from Home Depot, aired out for 24 hours, then steamed some places again.
The happy result was no more bed bugs.
(M)BedBugBlog - 08/19/2007
We did not spray any contact killers around the bed. I did not want to drive any bugs deeper into the walls where they'd become more difficult to kill. That meant using myself as bait and possibly getting more bites. But a few more bites and dead bedbugs would be better than getting sporadic bites for the rest of my life.
(M)
08/30/10 - TheBlaze by Meredith Jessup
US Grapples With Bedbugs as EPA Limits Options
Bedbugs are infesting U.S. households on a scale unseen in more than a half-century. They are largely resistant to common pesticides. Some homeowners and exterminators are turning to more hazardous chemicals that can harm the central nervous system, irritate the skin and eyes, and cause cancer.
(v)Via Instapundit
The Little Book of Obamacare Horrors08/30/10 - Retired Doc compares the promises of CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) with the realities analyzed at the NCPA (Natl Center for Policy Analysis).
[edited] (1) About half of the 15 million enrollees in Medicare Advantage plans are likely to lose their coverage and will be forced to return to conventional Medicare. If you keep your plan, expect higher premiums and fewer benefits.
(2) You must give your employer your most recent income tax return. Out-of-pocket premiums will be limited to a percentage of your family income. So, you will have to show what that income is, including your wife's income and investment income.
(3) The government plan is to take 500 billion from Medicare, spend it on something else, and call it a savings and a quality improvement to Medicare.
medicare advantage PPACA
(M)National Center for Policy Analysis
A Confused Keynesian Economist08/30/10 - Cato @ Liberty by Mark A. Calabria
[edited] Followers of Keynes say we are in a recession due to “a collapse in private demand.” Professor Tyson says we would be OK if everyone would buy more.
Yes, private personal consumption spending reached bottom in the Spring of 2009. But, it is now higher than at any point during the boom. (Chart at the link)
Investment is overall about 20% below its peak, holding back employment. The good news is that investment in such things as equipment and software is slowly rising. But the construction industry, particularly residential, is down 50% from its peak.
This suggests that unemployment comes from a mismatch between skills and available job openings. You simply cannot turn a construction worker into a nurse or computer programmer overnight.
AMG: This is why government intervention is so destructive. The government promoted building housing for people who could not pay for those houses. A huge number of people chose house building as a profession. This was not sustainable. Those people need to find productive work, but the government continues to scare businesses and distort the economy with government "stimulus" spending and the promise of higher taxes.
Keynes stimulus employment
(M)Stimulus Shrinks the Economy: The money is nice. The taxes and inflation are a killer.
Nothing Is Simple08/30/10 - Top Gear by James May
[edited]
Anyone who has done proper metalwork knows that a 10 mm diameter rod won't go into a 10 mm hole. Either the hole must be a bit bigger or the rod a bit smaller, or maybe both. If the hole is 10.03 mm, and the rod is 9.92 mm, they will go together. But they may be the other way around, and then they won't.
Say you want to make 1,000 rods and drill 1,000 holes, such that any rod goes into any hole. You'd need a system of controlling maximum and minimum dimensions for each, dictated by the fidelity of your manufacturing and measuring methods. We call these ‘tolerances', or in the language of the engineering workshop, ‘limits and fits'.
The earliest cars had no true commonality. Each part had to be made to fit by a ‘fitter', who would remove bits of metal. These cars were hideously expensive to buy and then to maintain.
AMG: We take for granted the vast amount of engineering work that has been done and is being done every day to make our world work. This complexity applies to machines, processes, and the relationships between people. No book or plan in a central bureaucracy can manage that complexity.
complexity
(v)Via Cafe Hayek
Protected From Bad Barbers08/21/10 - Volokh by Jonathan H. Adler
[edited] Yglesias: Regulation of this sort, of barbers, seems totally unnecessary. Even if regulation were a good idea, the regulatory board can't protect consumers. It is overwhelmingly composed of people from the industry whose incentive is to limit competition and raise prices.
Adler: Licenses restrict entry and reduce competition, enabling licensees to charge higher prices. This is true of most licensing, even when it appears to serve a public interest greater than barber's licenses. A licensing regime of this sort almost always has the support of current practitioners, who will benefit economically. Many public spirited rationales are a smokescreen, including claims for health and safety.
licensing, rent seeking
(v)Via Instapundit
Maximize Tax Revenue - Harm the Economy08/18/10 - Cato@Liberty by Daniel J. Mitchell
[edited] The goal of tax policy should not be to maximize revenue. At maximum revenue, the damage to the economy is so great that any higher tax rate raises no additional revenue, or even loses revenue.
Martin Feldstein of Harvard: As the tax rate rises, the “deadweight loss” rises, which is the real loss to the economy. As the rate gets close to maximizing revenue, the loss in production exceeds the gain in revenue.
I dislike budget deficits as much as anyone else. But, I would never give up say $1 billion of GDP in order to reduce the deficit by $100 million. National income is a goal in itself; that is our standard of living.
Deadweight Loss, Laffer Curve
(M)In Nov 1999, Martin S. Feldstein was the George F. Baker Professor of Economics at Harvard University and former President of the US National Bureau of Economic Research. He says more about the deadweight loss from taxes.
[edited] Traditional analyses of the income tax greatly underestimate deadweight losses by ignoring its effect on income and consumption. The full deadweight loss is easily calculated to be as much as 30% of total revenue.
The deadweight loss caused by increasing tax rates above current levels may exceed $2 per $1 of revenue increase.
AMG: Government activities and transfer payments had better be useful to the society, because economic output has already been lowered by 30% of the taxes currently collected. Further, $2 worth of production (jobs) will be destroyed for every additional $1 collected through increased tax rates.
Presidential Abuse of Office08/16/10 - Pajamas Media by Bob Owens
Darrell Issa (R-CA) in a 37-page report accuses the White House of “an unprecedented number of public relations and propaganda efforts", some illegal.
The Obama Administration frequently used federal agencies to promote the President’s favorite programs, and used the entertainment community to embed propaganda in television programming and artwork.
Obama has used government resources to activate a sophisticated propaganda and lobbying campaign. This is an abuse of office and a betrayal of the pledge to create “an unprecedented level of openness in Government.”
Obama, Malfeasance
(v)Via Instapundit
Video Explains Minimum WageFred: I'll get a raise when the minimum wage goes up.
Mike: If they don't fire you.
- -
06/15/10 - EO -> HotAir by Ed Morrissey
[edited] The minimum wage did no direct harm when it was less than the usual wage for entry-level jobs. When the minimum wage rose above that wage, employers stopped offering those entry level jobs.
Minimum Wage
(M)Economist Walter Williams and journalist John Stossel review the racist and anti-poor legislation mistakenly called "the minimum wage.” A 2010 video 8:25.
AMG: The real minimum wage is zero, what people are paid when their skills and work history cannot get them a job at the "minimum wage".
Stimulus Give and TakeFred: I see you hired a new guy subsidized by the stimulus program.
Boss: Yes. He is replacing you.
- -
05/05/10 - EO -> Aguanomics
The government cannot create production by subsidizing workers. It can only disrupt the labor markets.
Stimulus, Jobs, Government Subsidies
Recovery Despite Gov't InterventionGovernment: The free market failed, and government spending is fueling the recovery.
Mike: By "fueling" do you mean burning up resources?
Government: The biggest bureaucracies produce the wealthiest nations.
- -
05/02/10 - BigGovernment by Gary Wolfram
[edited] Consider this joke. A man jumps up every two minutes and waves his newspaper in the air. An observer asks what he is doing. The man says, “I’m scaring away the elephants.” The observer tells him that there are no elephants. The man responds, “See. It worked.”
The market system is repairing itself and creating wealth for the masses. The federal government enacts stimulus packages, health care reform, regulatory reform, and every other reform it can think of. Each "reform" actually slows down recovery, but the economy still makes steady progress. The government claims that these "reforms" are the cause of the recovery.
Robert Higgs argued persuasively that the Great Depression was in large part due to “regime uncertainty.” Roosevelt's interventions created uncertanties which scared away private investment. Higgs provides polling data showing a substantial number of corporate executives thought that all of the economic system might be socialized.
The failure of part time employment to be converted into full time employment in this recovery is due largely to regime uncertainty.
Great Depression, Slow Recovery
(M)
EasyOpinions: A Tested Stimulus Plan
The economic crisis is the result of a giant six year stimulus provided by housing loans. We now know it worked for a while and ended in disaster.
What will the current so called stimulus plans produce when the money runs out? An economy like the current one, but somewhat worse.
(M)EasyOpinions: Stimulus Does Not Cure a Recession
Jobs change when people change what they want to buy or can afford. It is possible to keep people at their low-value or unneeded jobs for a bit longer, only by wasting the savings that should be financing a real recovery.
Break the Law - Dominate ToysFred: Your company made the news due to your big-time negligence. Then Congress put heavy regulations on your industry. How is that working out?
Mike: It has put our small competitors out of business.
- -
04/24/10 - Easy Opinions -> Hot Air
[edited] Mattel broke the law by importing toys contaminated by lead paint. Congress overreacted with the CPSIA law, imposing costly testing requirements on all toys sold, including books, quilts, and bicycles. This has benefitted Mattel, which even gets further favorable rulings from the CPSC to reduce its costs.
Big business often shapes regulation to its advantage when it cannot stop it from being imposed, and continues this shaping through persistent lobbying in following years.
CPSIA, Lead Paint, Toys
(M)04/28/10 - Walter Olson
Thank powerful lawmaker Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and the Democratic congressional leadership for the bad effects of CPSIA. They have ignored the details of commerce, and are reluctant to admit or correct any errors.
(v)Via Advice Goddess - Amy Alkon
The War On Drugs and LibertyFred: They gave me five years for smoking marajuana.
Mike: I hope you use the time to become a better person.
- -
04/23/10 - YouTube video 8 minutes
[edited] Milton Friedman explains the case for legalizing drugs. See also www.LibertyPen.com .
Drug enforcement is a moral problem. It causes people to lose their lives and imprisons peaceful people. Next, the government will be regulating what people eat. (AMG: You think?)
War on Drugs, Legalization
(v)Via Cafe Hayek
Like Parties, Like GovernmentFred: That was a great meal, with a fine wine, in a wonderful hotel.
Mike: It's all on the expense account. That's why we call it a Party.
- -
04/21/10 - Don Surber -> Washington Post
[edited] Both of the national Democratic and Republican party committees spend about two-thirds of the money they raise on the care and comfort of committee staffs and on efforts to raise more funds, with lavish spending on limousines, expensive hotels, meals and tips.
AMG: They feel entitled as representatives of the people. It's a hard job, someone has to do it, and who could do it better? That justifies a party. They have to spend money in order to save money, or something like that.
National Party Committees, Political Spending
(M)04/21/10 - Washington Post
Both national party committees spend two-thirds of their funds on fancy meals, hotels, travel, and fundraising.
Obama's Tax ContemptFred: You promised not to raise any of my taxes.
Politician: I haven't and I won't. These are all new taxes.
- -
04/19/10 - Roger Kimball -> Investor's Business Daily
[edited] IBD: Why should the tea partiers be thankful? Obama said “one thing we have not done is raise income taxes on families making less than $250,000; that’s another promise we kept.”
Here is what candidate Obama said in September of 2008: “Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.”
Kimball: Obama is convinced that the left-liberal view is shared by any sufficiently enlightened, reasonable person. Dissent from that view is political, warped by self-interest, and evidence of stupidity. Ultimately, dissent would not only be called counterproductive, it would be proscribed as criminal or insane.
Obama, Taxes, Promises
(M)
Easy Opinions: Leading The People
They have a solution that will work if we would only stop arguing and agree with them.
They may need to omit some information about the new arrangements and what these will cost.
They observe that ordinary people do not think well enough to make decisions in their own long-term best interest.
Dissenters are either uninformed or selfish. There is no need to argue about the specific meanings of words. The good of the society justifies telling some lies, if it comes to that.
(M)Saul Alinsky: Rules For Radicals [online]
Saving $100 MillionGovernment: $100 million is a lot.
Fred: For me it is.
- -
04/15/10 - Wimp.com video 1:39.
What does saving $100 million mean?
Hint: 1/4 penny.
Budget Cuts, Government Spending
Nuclear Energy Costs Too MuchFred: Nuclear power is cheap to produce.
Mike: After you build a hugely expensive plant.
- -
10/22/08 - Cato Institute by Jerry Taylor
[edited] Nuclear power generates cheaper electricity than all other sources, due to low operation and maintenance costs, except perhaps hydro. But, investors must first pay $6-9 billion for construction. This is 20-30 times the cost ($300 million) of a natural gas plant, and 3-5 times the cost ($2 billion) of a coal plant. [Plants of different capacities]
A nuclear plant is so expensive and takes so long to build, that any error can bankrupt the power company. There are often cost overruns. Counting the costs of construction, the overall cost of producing nuclear power is 12-15 cents/kilowatt-hour, compared to 3.55 cents/kWh for a coal plant.
France, India, China, and Russia do not build cost-effective nuclear plants. Their government officials either build expensive plants and mandate high-cost electricity, or they build shoddy plants and hope for the best.
Nuclear Power, Electricity
(M)John Stossel interviews Jerry Taylor:
I thought that nuclear didn't pay for itself due to excessive regulations and expensive delays from environmentalist's lawsuits.
Taylor set me straight. The nuclear industry is comfortable with today's level of environmental regulation. The big problem is simply the huge cost. The same high costs are found in countries that are friendly to nuclear power.
State vs Private: Paid 1.45 to 1Fred: Working for the government is frustrating, boring, and unproductive.
Mike: Those work conditions demand higher pay.
- -
03/28/10 - Wall Street Journal
[edited] The US Bureau of Labor Statistics reports for 2009 that total pay for state and local government vs private employees was $39.66 vs $27.42. The public employee gets 45% more. Salaries/hour are 34% higher, and benefits are 70% higher.
Unionized government workers account for all of the difference. 28 of the 40 states that have a budget deficit would have a balanced budget if government workers were paid the same as private sector workers.
California has 3,000 retired teachers and school administrators, who stopped working as early as age 55, collecting pensions of $100,000+ per year for life.
Worse, government pensions are underfunded by $3.2 trillion. That is $27,000 for every American household.
Government Pay, Spending, Pensions
(v)Via Powerline Blog
Insurance Profit Is Not the ProblemFred: Those greedy, profit-making insurance companies are driving up the cost of health care.
Mike: Aren't they closely regulated by the state?
Fred: The state is full of idiots who don't do anything right. That's why I want a nationalized system.
- -
03/23/10 - LA Times by Jonah Goldberg
[edited] The Reality of Obamacare
Profit-hungry insurance companies are not the problem. Industry profit is about 3%, and the entire industry earned just $13 billion of profit last year, close to a rounding error in Medicare fraud.
Rather, healthcare costs have skyrocketed because consumers treat health insurance like an expense account. Putting almost everyone into one "risk pool" doesn't change the overspending. Eventually, only rationing care will cut costs.
The new law blocks all the exits. You can't opt out or buy cheap, high-deductible, catastrophic insurance. Even that coercion won't be enough to make the whole thing work, because the "cost curve" will not be bent down.
Health Insurance, ObamaCare
(v)Via Instapundit
(M)
03/25/10 - Amy Alkon -> WSJ by Holman Jenkins
[edited] CEO Angela Bray explained WellPoint's proposed 39% rate hike for health insurance in California. The two reasons are rising medical costs, and healthier customers are dropping their coverage. This puts medical costs onto the sickest customers.
When ObamaCare requires everyone to buy insurance, the health insurance industry no longer will be threatened. It can then pass skyrocketing costs [which those insurers cannot control] onto customers, who can no longer refuse to buy the insurance.
Rising costs won't be controlled, but this would no longer threaten the insurance industry.
(M)
06/01/09 - EO: The Medicare Tomato Market
An analogy and clear explanation of Medicare economics. Say that tomatoes were declared vital to life and made available free through the Medicare National Tomato Bank. The story of healthcare delivery is translated to the market for tomatoes.
Medicare/Medicaid spending is currently 1/2 of healthcare. Government underpays; doctors and hospitals stay in business by shifing the unpaid costs onto the insured patients, the ones who can pay and don't see the bills.
What Is ObamaCare?Fred: What is ObamaCare going to be like?
Mike: I'll try to sum up 4,000 pages in a few articles.
- -
03/23/10 - Powerline Blog by Scott Johnson
[edited] Articles about ObamaCare:
"20 ways Obamacare will take away our freedoms"
by David Hogberg at Investor's Business Daily.
"Health-Care Cost Lies Make Us Sing the Blues"
by Amity Shlaes at Bloomberg news.
"Obamacare's Immediate Impact"
by Glenn Reynolds at The Liberty Papers.
Quotes by Abraham Lincoln about redistribution.
Links to these articles are also available through the (M) links at the right.
ObamaCare, Healthcare
(M)"20 Ways Obamacare Will Take Away Our Freedoms"
by David Hogberg at Investor's Business Daily.
(M)"Health-Care Cost Lies Make Us Sing the Blues"
by Amity Shlaes at Bloomberg news.
(M)"Obamacare's Immediate Impact"
by Glenn Reynolds at The Liberty Papers.
Powering Down CaliforniaMary: The electricity is out again. And, our rate recently went up 20%.
Fred: I hate those fat-cat, power company execs. They just want to squeeze the little guy. Why can't the government do something?
Mary: I think they are doing something.
- -
03/17/10 - Chicago Boyz
[edited] The California Water Resources Board has found 19 natural gas power plants in violation of the Clean Water Act. This will shut down most of these plants. They use “once through" cooling, which warms the sea-water used to 90 degrees F without polluting it.
Other policies make it difficult to replace this electricity. California bans new nuclear and coal plants, and most new natural gas plants. Large-scale solar projects in the Mojave Desert have environmentalist opposition to building required transmission lines, and from Sen. Feinstein because they may threaten turtles. Wind turbines have objections because they may harm birds and bats.
Electricity bills should rise significantly. Energy intensive businesses probably should relocate.
Electric Power, Environmentalism
(M)
Shannon Love - comment [edited]
The Democrats are not at war with energy. They have long been at war with economically creative people.
If environmentalists cared about the environment, they would force mining, drilling, and manufacturing to relocate to third-world countries. Instead, they attack the econmically-creative as greedy villains who will wreck the ecosystem and literally kill everyone, unless they are stopped by wise and noble politicians.
Worse, most leftists don't understand that material wealth is created. They have absorbed the Marxist idea that material wealth (infrastructure, factories) springs from impersonal, natural forces which no human can claim credit for. They believe that material wealth is like Biblical manna that falls from the sky. The only real debate is how to distribute it “fairly.”
Within a decade we will see LA and other great California cities collapse like Detroit did in the 1970’s.
(M)
Easy Opinions: The Political Dictionary
Liberal Economics: Money falls from heaven for everyone to use. But, the immoral and sneaky rich gather more than their share. (continued)
CBO Creates Jobs On PaperFred: How many stimulus jobs have we created?
CBO: Just a second (runs computer program model) 2,343,458 jobs.
Fred: Did this scan a detailed database of collected information?
CBO: No. It always says that.
- -
03/17/10 - Cato@Liberty - Daniel J. Mitchell [edited]
Doug Elmendorf is Director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). He basically agrees with me, that their employment model simply spits out pre-determined numbers, regardless of what happens in the real economy. The CBO recently estimated that so-called stimulus spending generated jobs and growth.
Someone asked if the CBO model would be unable to detect whether the stimulus failed. After hemming, hawing, and a follow-up question, he confessed "that’s right".
(See this at 39:00 on the C-Span video at the article.)
AMG: Our economic future is being analyzed by CBO models that are entirely theoretical and are not compared to the reality that they are supposed to predict. It is the CBO that "scores" Congressional legislation, telling us what it will cost and how much we will save by "reducing the deficit".
Does this inspire a warm feeling of trust?
CBO, Congressional Budget Office, Employment, Stimulus
(M)03/19/10 - The Lid by Sammy Benoit
NY Times and Wash Post: CBO Numbers Stink
[edited] Democrats worked with the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office for more than a year, fine-tuning the bill in the last weeks. And, they consulted repeatedly with the bipartisan staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation.
When the CBO found cost and deficit targets would be missed, Democrats adjusted parts of the legislation to meet their goal.
Two of their tricks. (1) The first ten years of increased taxes are applied to only six years of costs. (2) $500 billion of Medicare savings are counted twice.
(M)
CBO Scores Congressional Legislation
CBO: The MedHelp bill spends $1 trillion and increases what you must borrow, the deficit, by $230 billion.
Politician: What if I tell you that we will stop paying the doctors, saving an additional $400 billion?
CBO: Can you really do that?
Politician: Just assume that I can. I'll write it into the margin.
CBO: Then, the bill spends $1 trillion and decreases the deficit by $170 billion, by raising taxes by $770 billion, and saving $400 billion on the doctors.
Press Conference: The bi-partisan, mathematical, unbiased, technoid, trustworthy, very smart CBO has just scored the MedHelp bill. Ladies and Gentlemen and Republicans, this bill delivers medical help to everyone, and reduces the deficit by $170 billion. How could any intelligent person be against it?
Pricey Public SchoolsFred: Are you sending your kids to a private school?
Mike: No. Our public school is more expensive.
- -
03/11/10 - Cato at Liberty video 3:00
[edited] Public school systems hugely understate what they spend. Many spend more than the best private schools in the U.S.
For example, Houston TX reports spending $8,418 each year per student from the General Fund. But the total is $12,834 when you add in all amounts spent from special funds that are dedicated to education.
Washington D.C. doesn't even publish its spending figure. A month of investigation gave $17,542 per student, but they omitted all spending on buildings and more. They actually spend $28,170 per student. [D.C. public schools deliver notoriously poor results.]
Tuitions for the best D.C. private schools: Sidwell Friends $30,842 [Obama's kids go here]. Washington International $28,465. The Potomac School $27,925. Georgetown Prep $25,650. Stone Ridge $22,420. Georgetown Visitation Prep $21,500.
Cato found unreported spending in almost every school district examined. Public school districts are spending private school amounts for public school settings. Spending in D.C. and the five largest metropolitan areas is 44% more than reported, on average.
Public Schools, Budgets
(M)They Spend WHAT? The Real Cost of Public Schools
03/10/10 - Cato Institute by Adam B. Schaeffer
The report which supports the video.
[edited] Real spending per pupil ranges from $12,000 in the Phoenix area to $27,000 in the New York metro area. The Chicago area actually spends 23% more than they report, and the Los Angeles metro region spends 90% more than they report (reports $10,000 per student, actually spends $19,000).
Father of the Economic CrisisFred: Fat cat bankers made loans to poor people who couldn't pay them back, and ..
Mike: .. and immediately sold those loans to government agencies, who encouraged or required them to do it, overseeing and approving the entire operation.
- -
03/04/10 - Edd Driscoll
CNBC interviewed banking analyst Dick Bove [edited]:
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are bankrupt today, the government is spending hundreds of millions of dollars supporting them [actually many billions -ag], and hundreds of thousands of people are losing their homes.
Mr. Andrew Cuomo was secretary of Housing and Urban Development 1997-2001. He is the "father of the subprime loan crisis" through his actions at HUD. He pushed Fannie and Freddie to buy more subprime mortgages, to increase home ownership among the poor. Many of those homeowners defaulted, and the mortgage-backed securities market collapsed.
AMG: Bankers and mortgage lenders are blamed for being predatory, selling risky loans to the poor. They were carrying out government policy, and creating the loans that Fannie and Freddie wanted to guarantee and buy. Now, the government blames everyone else for the policies that it encouraged and often required.
Housing Crisis, Financial Crisis
(M)10/2008 - Easy Opinions
We Guarantee It -
The Government Caused the Economic Crisis
Toyota : The Driver, not the PedalFred: Did you try shifting into neutral?
Mike: I was too busy calling 911 on my cellphone. What is "neutral"?
- -
03/02/10 - Professor Bainbridge
[edited] Outside the world of trial lawyers and Democratic congressmen, investigators know that the vast majority of sudden, unintended accelerations are the fault of the driver applying the gas pedal instead of the brakes. Efforts to prove otherwise have proven to be frauds or failures.
The overall chance of a fatal auto accident is 1/800 each 10 years. The alleged fatality rate for sudden acceleration is 1/200,000 recalled Toyotas. Even if all the worst things about Toyotas are true, and you aren't smart or calm enough to shift to neutral, your overall risk of death is 250 times greater than from unintended acceleration.
Toyota, Sudden Acceleration, Autos
(M)
12/2009 - Car and Driver [edited]
The natural reaction to a stuck throttle is to stomp on the brake pedal. Brakes by and large can rein in an engine roaring under full throttle.
We pinned the Camry’s gas pedal while going 70 mph. The brakes easily overcame 268 horsepower and stopped the car in 190 feet, just 16 feet more than without the gas pedal. That is 1 foot less than a Ford Taurus without acceleration problems
(M)
03/03/10 - Popular Mechanics
Mechanic's Diary: Toyota's Gas Pedal [edited]
The injuries, a few deaths, and the mechanical problems are real, but statistically only a very small blip. Sudden unintended acceleration (SUA) is notoriously difficult to diagnose, and most often cannot be repeated for a mechanic.
In the 1980's, the NHTSA investigated SUA in the Audi. It found no mechanical problem, blaming driver error. For context, there were about 24,000 complaints of SUA in the last 10 years involving almost every major automaker. The NHTSA investigated fewer than 50.
What about the claims that vehicles run away with no input, despite attempts to stop them? Probably, some drivers want to get rid of their car, and some drivers pressed the gas instead of the brake. It's happened to me. I recognized my mistake and corrected before it went bang. Others may not have had the presence of mind.
(M)03/05/10 - Popular Mechanics
Handling SUA - Sudden Unintended Acceleration
Mike Allen stops his car at 55 mph with the throttle open.
Do: Brake hard, Shift to Neutral, Steer to a safe place.
Don't: Pump or ride the brakes, Shift to Park, Turn off the engine - except as a last resort.
Video 2:08 and text summary.
(M)03/12/10 - The Atlantic by Megan McArdle
Are Toyota's Defect Real?
[edited] Ted Franks: The driver's age was reported or inferred in 24 cases: 60 61 63 66 68 71 72 72 77 79 83 85 and 89.
Toyota "electronic defects" apparently discriminate against the elderly, just as sudden acceleration in Audis and GM autos did in the past.
(M)03/12/10 - Forbes by Michael Fumento
Toyota Hybrid Horror Hoax - A Media Frenzy
[edited] The patrol car didn't slow down the Prius; the bumpers never touched. The officers used a loudspeaker to tell Sikes to use the brakes and emergency brake together. He did; the car slowed to about 55 mph. Sikes turned off the engine and coasted to a halt. He stopped the car on his own.
The 911 dispatcher for 23 minutes asked Sikes to shift into neutral. He simply refused, then only talked to say that he thought he could smell his brakes burning.
It's a Toyota media feeding frenzy. The media won't let incredible stories and readily refutable claims get in the way.
(v)Via Instapundit
(M)06/19/11 - Overlawyered by Walter Olson
[edited] ABC’s Brian Ross has received an Edward R. Murrow prize for his Toyota-panic reporting. Amazingly, he used staged, fakey footage, omitted details that would have raised doubts, and relied on a safety consultant involved with plaintiffs in the controversy. Later investigations decisively refuted the fears that Toyotas have some mysterious tendency to accelerate out of control.
AMG: Olson provides links to posts which describe the truth about Toyotas and "sudden accelleration".
MisandryFred: Three men robbed the bank.
Mike: Thankfully, eight police personnel caught them.
- -
02/26/10 - Classical Values by Eric
[edited] "The word "misandry" was flagged in red, unknown to the spell-checker, even though it is hardly a new word. Misandry is the hatred of men."
"Men do not exist unless they commit crimes or do bad things. Men are "people" or "personnel" when they do good things. They are "men" when they do bad things.
There is a connection between misandry and feminism. This has been slipped by me, over the years. I'm pissed off. I don't take kindly to being manipulated."
YouTube video 7:35.
Misandry, Men
(v)Via Instapundit
Prosecuted For Being "Bad"Prosecutor: I don't like you, or what you do, or how you structure your life, or anything about you. You are going to jail, my friend.
Mike: What law have I broken, exactly?
Prosecutor: You must have disappointed someone at some time. That is enough, in my view.
- -
02/23/10 - Minding the Campus - Reforming Our Universities
by Harvey A. Silverglate
[edited] "George Orwell wrote his critique 'Politics and the English Language' in 1946: 'One must let meaning choose the word, not the other way around.'
Administrators and legislators ignore this truth. They have crafted imprecise regulations which give campus disciplinary staff and federal government prosecutors enormous and grotesquely unfair power."
"It did not matter that no particular law was transgressed. A federal prosecutor might feel in his gut and in his sole discretion, that a defendant had somehow deprived someone of 'honest services' that were due. The defendant could end up serving a decades-long prison sentence. It was rather like prosecuting a citizen for being 'a bad person', with the government defining badness."
Law, Federal Regulations
(v)Via Instapundit
Free Speech, No HecklingFred: My voice will not be silenced!
Mike: Would you mind not standing on my coffee table?
- -
02/18/10 - Los Angeles Times by Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean of the UC Irvine School of Law
"Those who yelled to keep the ambassador from being heard were not engaged in constitutionally protected behavior. Freedom of speech, on campuses and elsewhere, is rendered meaningless if speakers can be shouted down by those who disagree."
"The law is well established that the government can act to prevent a heckler's veto -- to prevent the reaction of the audience from silencing the speaker. There is simply no 1st Amendment right to go into an auditorium and prevent a speaker from being heard, no matter who the speaker is or how strongly one disagrees with his or her message."
Free Speech, Heckling
(v)Via Advice Goddess by Amy Alkon
Obama <---> Acorn: Distant and CloseFred: How can Obama completely contradict himself?
Mike: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of tiny Republican minds.
- -
02/20/10 - Stop the ACLU
Obama speaks calmly and firmly in two short videos. First, he reports only a distant contact with Acorn 13 years ago. Second, he tells an Acorn crowd that he wants their input, and will call them about his campaign if they fail to call him.
Article and embedded video 2 min.
Obama, Acorn, Lies
(v)Via Don Surber
(M)The video at YouTube 2 min
World's Smallest Political QuizFred: I didn't know that I was Authoritarian until I took the quiz.
Mike: I knew.
- -
02/08/10 - Advocates for Self-Government
Answer 11 questions of political opinion. See where you are on a graph of Liberal vs Conservative, Authoritarian vs Libertarian, and Centrist.
Political Survey, Liberal, Conservative, Authoritarian, Libertarian, Centrist
(v)Via Classical Values
Self Reliance Under SocialismFred: We all work for each other under Socialism.
Mike: I had a job once. Didn't like it much.
- -
02/05/10 - National Review by Victor Davis Hanson
Hanson [edited]: I knew a small hotelier at a seaside resort in Greece. He checked you in, cooked, did maintenance during the day, and landscaped at night. Why didn't he hire some help?
He replied about the cost and filling out forms to hire an unmotivated, permanent worker in Greece, and the difficulty of ever firing him if he proved worthless. Almost everyone was on pension, disability, or government benefit, and were unwilling to work, leaving only illegal immigrants or broke foreign students.
He blasted socialism and hated the government. He had to be an expert tax dodger and bartered whenever he could.
He lamented that the people in Greece spend their time trying to get government money or avoiding the tax collectors, or preferably both.
Socialism, Greece
(M)Victor Davis Hanson describes more about socialism, with a section (4) on the Greek version.
[edited] "The Greeks cheat in every way imaginable on their taxes. On an average day, a shopkeeper, repairman, or business person would offer a 30% discount for cash, off the books. Tax-dodging was a national pastime, practiced by dyed-in-the-wool socialists."
Corporations Must Have Free SpeechFred: My friends and I support Jenkins for senator.
Mike: OK, as long as you guys aren't incorporated.
Fred: No way! We're union local 328.
- -
01/22/10 - Cato @ Liberty by Julian Sanchez
The Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United is a clear and needed support for free speech. It strikes down restrictions on corporations, allowing them now to contribute money toward political speech. Many liberal voices denounce the influence that a corporation, a legal construct, can now have in politics. Their opposition ignores the reality of an organized society.
Sanchez [edited]: "What happens if politicians can limit freedoms because they are expressed through a corporation? Journalists would enjoy full freedom of the press as long as they don’t use the resources of the New York Times, Random House, or Comcast. Those corporations could be barred from using their property to circulate ideas."
"You are free to practice your religion without interference. But, if it’s an unpopular one, you could be hindered from sending your kids to a religious school or building a church, because those tend to involve incorporating."
Free Speech, Corporations, Politics
(M)Speech For Me, But Not for Thee
01/22/10 - Cato @ Liberty by Roger Pilon
[edited] "The Citizens United decision will probably alter politics for the good. Corporations, unions, and their officers will no longer fear criminal prosecution under prohibitions that even FEC commissioners don't understand. There will be more political speech and more perspectives on the issues of the day."
"The complex federal campaign finance system is only a way station to exclusive public campaign financing. At that end point, political speech in the form of campaign contributions would rest safely in incorruptible [hah] public hands. Except, of course, for contributions that take the form of editorials by such corporate giants as The New York Times, which the First Amendment would continue to protect.
How a Community Organizer Became President Lesson 1: Rental housing complaints.
Lesson 2: Community Improvement Grants.
Lesson 3: Becoming President.
- -
01/14/10 - TCU Nation by dwood
L. David Alinsky is the son of the famous Chicago radical, the late Saul D. Alinsky. The Boston Globe published his letter on 08/31/08 boasting that Barack Obama had made enormously effective use of his training in Saul Alinsky's methods.
David Alinsky [edited]: "I am proud to see that my father's organizing model is being applied to affect the 2008 Democratic campaign. It is a fine tribute to my father as we approach his 100th birthday. My father produced a powerful strategy for initiating change and making it really happen, when executed meticulously and thoughtfully. Obama learned his lesson well."
dwood: Obama's most significant education was not at Columbia or Harvard Law, but the years he spent training in the Saul Alinsky system for community organizing, and teaching workshops on Alinsky's methods.
Obama, Saul Alinsky, Community Organizer
(v)Via Amused Cynic
Gatekeeping for the ClimateAllowing questions would confuse the issues.
- -
12/22/09 - TWAWKI
[edited] Gatekeeping is the preferred practice of climate alarmists, who censor and manipulate the data that doesn’t suit their cause, to manipulate public opinion.
Liarpedia: William Connelly at Wikipedia has adjusted over 5000 articles on Global Warming, to write off inconvenient facts and opinions that expose his alarmist push as fraud. Wikipedia has done nothing in response.
Googlegate: Google adjusted auto-suggest to minimise references to Climategate.
Climategate: UNIPCC scientists manipulated temperature data and limited access to it.
(v)Via Climate Audit
Who's Meaner - Corporate or Government Bureaucrats?John: We are heartless if we deny claims, and wasting public funds if we grant them.
Mike: That's why we have civil service job protection. And, we're the Government. Who will they complain to?
- -
12/20/09 - 12/20/09 - Powerline Blog
The American Medical Association has reported on national health insurers for 2008. Medicare denied medical claims at 1.77 times the rate of the average private insurer.
Claims denied: Medicare 6.85%, Aetna 6.8%, Anthem Blue Cross 3.44%, Average of private insurers 3.88% .
(M)
08/06/09 - ObamaCare and the Doctor by Zane F. Pollard MD
Dr. Pollard describes the frightening current reality of Medicaid, and by extension the future of ObamaCare.
Medicaid pays for medical services to the poor, and in this case to poor children who face vision impairment or blindness. Regardless, Medicaid denies and delays their care. Medicare and Medicaid are intentionally underpaying for the medical care that they mandate.
Tiger Woods, Barack Obama, and ImageMary: Oh no! They see us and know who you are.
John: Don't worry. It's only some reporters, and my guys will handle them.
- -
12/08/09 - American Thinker by Lisa Schiffren
[edited] Schiffren: "We liked Tiger personally for an image that we now see is a fraud. We liked his low-key demeanor, manners, sweet smile, magazine covers, political analogies, and product endorsements. We feel betrayed. Even more, we see how much sustained, deliberate deception goes into the construction of a public image, when there is profit to be made or power to be had."
AG: Surprise is discovering the real Tiger Woods. Shock is understanding that we were fooled by techniques used by both athletes and politicians.
(v)Via Ed Driscoll
How On Earth Did We Miss It?
[edited] Howard Kurtz: This exposes the dark secret of the celebrity beat: It’s a shared illusion, perpetrated by the media-industrial complex. We don’t really know these people, who are cloaked in the mantle of fame, despite their ubiquity on our front pages, television screens, and laptops.
Spending Hurts, Not Just Deficits
John: You will love the $20,000 boat I bought.
Mary: You spent the college fund?
John: Relax, it's on the credit card.
- -
12/15/09 - Cato at Liberty by Daniel J. Mitchell (video 6 min)
Politicians fixate on the deficit to pull a bait and switch. They claim that they can raise taxes to solve the problem. That only replaces debt-financed spending with tax-financed spending. The likely result is that the required tax increases will weaken the economy and make us all poorer.
(M)01/13/09 - EasyOpinions
The Real Tax Burden - is everything that the government spends. It is your money, now or in the future. Borrowing delays taxes while paying interest, just like a credit card.
Motive for ClimateGateTerry (Marlon Brando) in "On the Waterfront": You don't understand. I coulda had class. I coulda been a contender. I coulda been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what I am, let's face it.
- -
12/12/09 - ChicagoBoyz comment by VeryRetired
For years, you’re just some guy who answers arcane questions about weather systems or historical climate trends. Nobody notices you at conventions, clamors for interviews, or gives you money or office space.
Suddenly, you are the chief interpreter of the unknown. You are the expert in complex interpretations of obscure data that are predicting imminent, global catastrophe.
Give all that up, just because some tree rings don’t fit, because some doubter somewhere might argue with your predictions?
(M)Quotes from "On the Waterfront"
Fort Hood Parallel UniverseIt is shocking when a Christian commits violence.
- -
11/06/09 - DocsOnTheWeb by 911Doc
"Bobby Lee Smith, in a rage fueled by his fundamentalist Christian beliefs, went on a murder spree at Fort X today, killing 13 and wounding thirty. The FBI has arrested all known acquaintances of Mr. Smith, and has taken his family in for questioning." (satire)
(M)Will The Truth Be Hasan's Last Victim?
11/09/09 - LegalInsurrection by William A. Jacobson
The facts about Nidal Hasan's killing spree at Fort Hood.
Illinois Wellfare Promises
They will just have to eat less for a while. We aren't reducing staff here.
- -
The state is not a good social insurance company. It sets aside no investments to support its future promises. Instead, it spends whatever is available on whatever serves politicians at the moment. Illinois is out of money.
(v)Via Don Surber
CBO Rates Republican Health PlanRight: Let's do the obvious and uncomplicated things first.
Left: You have no regulatory vision.
- -
11/05/09 - Washington Examiner
The Congressional Budget Office analyzed the Republican health care plan. It would reduce insurance premiums and cut the ten-year deficit by $68 billion.
It would create high-risk insurance pools, allow purchase of insurance policies from any state, and reform malpractice rules. It is not a government insurance plan.
(v)Via Instapundit
(M)We have millions of administrators in government, with more on the way
- -
July 09 - EasyOpinions
Medicare Myth: Low Administrative Cost
Medicare claims 3% administrative overhead, compared to 12% for private insurance. But, Medicare doesn't count all of its expenses, and private insurance is burdened with taxes that are part of its "overhead". Medicare overhead per patient is actually 25% more than for private insurance.
We Can't Stop Government GrowthJim: We will rise up to limit the government and restore our freedom.
Joe: Yes comrade. May I ask, do you intend to finish your soup?
- -
11/02/09 - Independent.org by Robert Higgs
[edited] "Every genuine solution must be implemented by enough people and money, through ideological conversions on a substantial scale, if such conversions are possible at all."
"The troubling fact remains, that if any truly effective measures are approved to limit the government, the rulers would likely resort to whatever legal or illegal violence proved necessary to prevent those measures from taking effect."
(M)Via Cafe Hayek
Rules For RadicalsThey have money and principles; we have neither. Which do you want to take from them?
- -
08/04/2000 - OrangeJuiceBlog
A version of Saul Alinsky's political handbook "Rules For Radicals". Machiavelli wrote "The Prince" in 1505 as a guide to getting and maintaining power from the top down. Alinsky presents ruthless tactics for gaining power from the bottom up, aimed at the underbelly of the tolerant modern state.
This is a key to understanding current politics.
(v)10/23/09 - Wall Street Journal by James Tarranto
Rules for Presidents
(M)10/24/09 - Vancouver Community Network
A simpler version of Rules For Radicals.
(M)"The Prince" by Nicolò Machiavelli, free online.
(M)05/03/10 - RightWingNews - Best quotes from Rules For Radicals.
Don't Reinflate the Housing BubbleIf we stoppped pushing houses, the voters might suspect it was wrong to do it last time.
- -
10/17/09 - Washington Examiner by Michael Barone
[edited] "Our financial system broke down because government policies created a housing bubble of more construction and increasing prices. The bubble broke. Democratic policymakers are responding by trying to recreate the housing bubble.
(v)Via Instapundit
(M)10/16/09 - WSJ by Peter Walliston
"Barney Frank, Predatory Lender"
Mortgage brokers are supposed to be the villians. But, they could only produce what bigger lenders wanted to buy. They could only respond to demand, not create it themselves.
The principal buyers were government insured banks, government enterprises such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, federal housing agencies, and private companies forced to comply with government mandates about mortgage lending.
(M)10/18/09 - Washington Post by Charles Lane
"Doubling Down On the Wrong Housing Policy"
The government encouraged a teacher to put her retirement savings into a new house.
Blunting Costs of Healthcare ReformHealthcare reform is going to be great and less expensive. That is why we senators are excluding ourselves, federal workers, unions, and the people and political players in our own states.
- -
10/09/09 - WSJ Opinion by Kimberley A. Strassel
Powerful senators want "reform" for the nation, so long as it doesn't disadvantage the people who support or vote for them.
(M)10/14/09 - PJTV: Medically Incorrect (video 3m)
Baucus Bill Bull: Hypocrite senators Want To Pass a Doozy
Remembering What Didn't HappenThink about the wedding, the punchbowl, and spilling it all on your parents.
- -
10/06/09 - Advice Goddess (video clip 4m)
Elizabeth Loftus is Prof. of Psychology and Law at U.Cal Irvine. She explains how 1/4 of study participants were given false memories of their childhood. A good reason to believe the evidence, not the story.
(M)Prof. Elizabeth Loftus: What's the Matter With Memory (video lecture 71m)
What Is Defensive Medicine?I love that rush of fear when I don't test for something.
- -
Engineering motto: If the tolerance for error is zero, then the cost has to be infinite.
- -
09/29/09 - 09/08/09 - Happy Hospitalist
A four part chart shows why doctors order lots of tests, and patients like this. This is expensive. So what?
(v)Via OverLawyered
Memo - Health Plan Deficit ReductionWe are going to rearrange it all, anyway. Just make it look good now.
- -
An internal memo about removing any deficit from the health plan. (satire)
(M)09/17/09 - OpenMarket by Hans Bader
Cap-and-Trade legislation would cost middle class taxpayers hundreds of billions. Household taxes could rise $1761 per year, a 15% increase. Jobs in steel, paper, aluminum, chemical, and cement manufacturing would migrate to countries with lower environmental costs than the U.S.
Taxes on business would be directly passed on to consumers.
Obama's Speech On HealthcareWe need quality healthcare, at low cost, with no restrictions, by friendly and unhurried doctors, and ... a chicken in every pot. That is my plan. Really. We should do it.
- -
09/09/09 - PowerLineBlog by John Hinderaker
A review of the main quotes and distortions.
Obama: "This insurance exchange will take effect in four years, which gives us time to do it right." But wait! Obama says this is an emergency, without a moment to lose. With four years to spare, he could stop cramming the bill down Americans' throats.
(M)
You will all be rich and happy
(When we get this darned bureaucracy working)
- -
09/09/09 - Cato by Michael F. Cannon
Quotes from Obama's speech, and the real-world translations.
(v)Via Instapundit
(M)09/12/09 - Ed Driscoll
Analysis from Mark Steyn, Thomas Sowell, and especially Shikha Dalmia:
[edited] Obama the bipartisan embraced every bad, big-government idea from both sides. If he prevails, the American public won’t get 'choice and competition', but will get a one-size-fits-all, government-prescribed health care plan that it can't refuse or challenge.”
(M)09/09/09 - The Atlantic by Arnold Kling
Obama: "Reducing waste and inefficiency in Medicare/caid will pay for most of this plan."
Kling: "If we don't pass this plan, does Obama intend to keep the waste and inefficiency out of spite?"
(v)
Arnold Kling blogs at Econlog.Econlib.org
(M)07/26/09 - EasyOpinions by Andrew Garland
I have that analysis somewhere. Here it is. No, thats my grocery list.
- -
Where is the policy paper, Obama's careful plan and research on healthcare reform?
Czars in AmericaMy Czars have my full support, but you can't hold me responsible for what they do. It is silly to think that I can watch every action of 31 people.
- -
09/05/09 - Hot Air by Ed Morrissey
Barack Obama’s 31 czars are a dramatic executive overreach. This is far more imperial than any action by President Bush.
(v)Via Instapundit
Why There Are No New JobsMarx revealed that business owners are leeches on society, draining away the wealth that rightfully belongs to the workers. At least, the ones who have jobs.
- -
09/05/09 - Commentary Magazine by Jennifer Rubin
Obama has utterly ignored or rejected proposals to promote private-sector job growth. The threatening environment of higher taxes and deficits causes companies to make only critical investments and slow down job creation. Obama cannot have a recovery by attacking private businesses while expanding government.
It turns out we need those private-sector employers.
(v)Via Instapundit
Death Panels in BritainWe don't kill them. They choose to die when we stop feeding them.
- -
09/02/09 - PowerLineBlog
Under NHS guidance, patients are diagnosed as close to death without allowing that the diagnosis could be wrong. This creates a self-fulfilling prophecy where food and fluids are denied until sedated patients die. Nationwide discontent is building up, as family and friends witness this denial of care.
(M)Monty Python on Death Panels (humor, video 2:00)
Prevention Costs 8x As MuchThis pill saves lives, 1/100th of the time.
- -
09/01/09 - Fox Business by John Stossel
Sally Pipes of the Pacific Research Institute: Suppose we enact measures to control heart disease and diabetes with complete success. The cost would be $8.5 trillion over 30 years, but would save only $1 trillion treating those diseases. Prevention improves health, but doesn't save money.
(M)Sally Pipes in the Washington Examiner
Free To ChooseThe most important single fact about a free market is that no exchange takes place unless both parties benefit.
- -
Governments never learn. Only people learn.
- -
Videos of the 1980, 1990 TV series about economics and freedom by the late Nobel economist Milton Friedman.
A presentation about freedom, markets, capitalism, and prosperity. Friedman is clear and direct. It is a first course in free markets and free minds, and was a popular success on network television.
(v)Via Chicago Boyz
What Work Means in LifeYou say you are happy doing that?
- -
08/18/09 - Mike Rowe of the TV series "Dirty Jobs" (Video 20:34)
What he has learned from surprising and dangerous jobs. He describes his personal anagnorisis, the point, especially in a tragedy, at which the hero recognizes his true identity or situation, and peripeteia, a sudden change in fortune from learning the truth.
15:55 The war on work. We have forgotten the benefits and satisfaction of doing a trade and learning from others the practical nature of what life demands.
(v)Via Docs On The Web
Canadian Healthcare Is SickCanada needs change. Maybe private healthcare?
- -
08/15/09 - Google News by Jennifer Graham (CP)
Dr. Anne Doig is president of the Canadian Medical Association.
We all agree, the system is imploding and more precarious than Canadians realize. We are all running flat out, trying to stay ahead of day-to-day demands. The current system is not sustainable.
(v)Via Docs On the Web
(M)National Post Editorial: Canadian health care is no model.
(M)08/15/09 - Docs On the Web
The health care bill is the worst abomination since MTV stopped playing music videos.
Taking from specialty care to fund primary care will produce savings because more people will die. Here is the theory and the reality of preventive care.
Electricity Situation in BritainHoney, no lights, no TV, no internet, and the food is warming up. Are we still environmentalists?
- -
08/12/09 - Chicago Boyz by Carl from Chicago
Electricity has to be generated from somewhere, and traditional sources are Coal, Gas, Nuclear, Hydroelectric, and Insignificant.
Britain’s electricity demand peaked at 59 GW (billion watts) in 2009. 45% from North Sea gas, 35% coal, 15% nuclear, and 5% other. By 2015, modest growth will require 64 GW. From where? Our generation plants are aging, and there is nothing planned to replace them.
(M)Problems with Green Energy
Progressive Redistribution -> Low growthI gave up half my income for the good of .. something. That's what LBJ did in 1970.
- -
08/11/09 - Chicago Boyz
President Lyndon Johnson publicly admitted that his “Great Society” was a redistributionist scheme. He gloated that future generations would just have to live with it. This policy choked off growth during the 1970’s by doubling the Capital Gains Tax.
So what have we lost? Long term U.S. economic growth was 4.5% from 1780 to 1970. Recessions were followed by high growth recoveries. The per capita growth rate was 3.5%. In 1970 that growth rate dropped to 1.5% and stayed there.
GDP would have increased by 4x from 1969 to 2009 at the 3.5% rate. GDP has actually increased by 1.8x at the 1.5% rate. Without LBJ and “Limits to Growth”, our per capita economy would now be 2.2x larger.
(M)Stimulus Shrinks the Economy. The money is nice. The taxes and inflation are a killer.
Government Medicaid RxDon't look, government healthcare and sausages are being made here.
- -
08/10/09 - The Independence Institute (Video 1:30)
Oregon provides Medicaid through government rules drawn up by political lobbying each year.
Government raises costs; it requires that many services be covered by regulated healthcare insurance, the services that provide income for influential provider groups.
Emergency services don't have a lobby, so forget about them. Priorities: (High) Stop Smoking, (Low) Head Injury.
(v)Via Cafe Hayek by Don Boudreaux
(M)08/25/09 - Insureblog by Henry Stern
Mandates increase insurance costs for Shelley Roche in Maryland. (Video 2:21)
Is the Science Settled for Climate Change?We have our own consensus here in government. The debate is over.
- -
08/05/09 - OpenMarket by Marlo Lewis
There are three basic issues in the climate change debate: How much has the world warmed? How much from greenhouse gases? What will more greenhouse gases do? These issues are not settled, not even close, and here is why.
One of many points. The U.S. surface temperature record is supposed to be the best in the world. But, it is riddled with false warming biases. "We found stations located next to exhaust fans of air conditioning units, surrounded by asphalt parking lots, on blistering-hot rooftops, and near structures that absorb and radiate heat. We found 68 stations at wastewater plants, where waste digestion raises the air temperature."
Nice graphs with medium scientific detail. Readable, or watch the video.
(M)Dispelling the Global Warming Myth
Spot the AstroturfersThey're fanatics. They made their own signs.
- -
08/06/09 - Looking at the Left by El Marco
A picture essay with commentary about political demonstrators at a health clinic for-and-against healthcare reform. Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi visited that clinic. Which are the concerned citizens, and which are the hired demonstrators?
El Marco: This is the first time in my life that I can recall a government in North America organizing protests of one group of citizens against another. This is standard operating procedure in countries with left-wing governments.
Pelosi said recently, about critics at town hall events: "I think they’re AstroTurf. You be the judge. They’re carrying swastikas and symbols like that to a town meeting on health care."
(v)Via Ed Driscoll
Ten Questions For Your CongressmanDo you expect me to have answers for everything?
- -
08/03/09 - Washington Examiner by Hugh Hewitt
Ten questions and honest answers about current healthcare reform. Ask your Congressman or Senator. Question 4: "If seniors will be allowed the expensive, most effective treatments, how will costs be controlled?"
(v)Instapundit
Minimum Wage Equals Minimum JobsFire them if you have to, but don't underpay.
- -
07/30/09 - Reason.com by John Stossel
Why not set the minimum wage at $100/hour? That would send funds to poor people while lifting the economy, right?
(M)The ones who are still working will thank us for the raise.
- -
07/03/2009 - WSJ Opinion - The Young and the Jobless
Economist David Neumark wrote here that the $.70 /hour increase in the minimum wage would remove 300,000 jobs. Sure enough, it increased to $7.25 in July, and the August and September numbers show jobs disappearing for teenagers.
Screening for TerroristsMy shrimp catcher is 99% accurate. So, why are there so many snails?
- -
If your test is wrong 1/100, and you are looking for 1 in 10,000, then 99% of your detained people are going to be innocent.
(v)Via Schneier on Security
Expensive German Wind PowerWe will pay 2.5 times more. Is that too much for a good cause?
- -
The wholesale price will be US 21¢ per KWH, plus retail markup to pay for distribution and billing costs. Compare this to the average US retail price of 11.28¢
(v)Via Instapundit
Not Just WordsWords are powerful. Numbers are cold.
- -
Obama doesn't respect numbers.
Health Care Reform Removes 5 Freedoms We are all in this together, so you will pay for us.
- -
07/24/09 - Fortune at Money.CNN by Shawn Tully
The fine print in the Congressional plans removes many freedoms of the current system: To choose your doctors, To keep your existing plan, To choose what's in your plan, To choose high-deductible coverage, To pay your real costs and be rewarded for healthy living.
(v)Instapundit
Hidden Victims of Health ReformSomebody is going to pay, but I don't think it will be me. Right?
- -
07/24/09 - WSJ by John Fund
Health reform will require some people to sacrifice. Democrats have kept that knowledge from those who would bear the brunt. They convinced healthcare industry groups not to run the “Harry and Louise” style ads that opposed HillaryCare in 1993.
Sen. Tom Coburn (R., Okla.): "The pressure has bordered on extortion." Newt Gingrich: "Groups were told that they would give up their seat at the table if they ran ads. They weren’t told that they would be the lunch."
Losers: Young people, Small businesses, Health savings accounts, Medicare Advantage.
(v)Via Instapundit
Why Doesn't Obama Get to Work?I was happy to be an inspiration to you all.
- -
3/11/09 - Small Dead Animals by Kate
Carol Platt Liebau was managing editor of the Harvard Law Review (from audio):
"Tom Pirelli is the one who did most of the day to day work. Barack Obama was nowhere to be seen. Occasionally he would drop in, talk to people, and then leave, as though his arrival had been a benediction in itself. But, not very much got done.
You see that and think, gosh, maybe that's the way the guy operates. He had his eye on bigger things. But, now he's President; there isn't a bigger or better thing."
(v)Via Ed Driscoll
20 Questions for ObamaI can restate my policy goals, but I'm not a detail man. (chuckle, smile)
- -
7/22/09 Economist Keith Hennessey
5. You proposed spending money from the TARP to prevent foreclosures, help small businesses, and to buy toxic assets from banks. In June, CBO found no evidence that any money has been spent for any of these programs. How many foreclosures have been prevented, how many small businesses have received loans, and how many toxic assets have been purchased?
(M)11/3/08 National Review
All of Obama's promises have expiration Dates.
The Good Intentions of WelfareI miss having responsibility for my life.
- -
Economist Walter Williams, 1983 (video 27 mins)
Influence and Access to Good Schools
Minimum Wage, Licensing, and Labor Laws
The Welfare System and Conclusions
The government offers help, but in a way that leads people to a life of dependence and broken families.
(v)7/22/09 Cafe Hayek by economist Don Boudreaux
Borrowing Costs Per LegislatorWe'll pay you to put away the national credit card.
EMP AttackHoney, the TV is on the blink. And, everything else.
- -
Consider a nuclear explosion 200 miles up. It emits a powerful wave of radiation which causes a huge electrical wave. You won't feel much, but it will fry all the electrical systems and digital electronics that we depend on to run everything. How will we survive?
(v)Via Instapundit
Obama is Jimmy Carter RebornMake no mistake, no one can fix our problems. Don't blame me.
- -
Six months as President, Barack Obama is driving south into the political speed trap known as Carter Country. It is a sad-sack landscape in which every major initiative meets with failure and scorn from political allies and foes alike.
(v)Via AdviceGoddess
Cloward-Piven Plan for SocialismCloward: The ruling classes use welfare to weaken the poor. Poor people can advance only when the rest of society is afraid of them.
- -
Columbia University political scientists Richard Cloward and Frances Piven proposed to bankrupt the welfare system and produce radical change. This is called the "crisis strategy" or the "bankrupt-the-cities" strategy.
They proposed flooding the welfare rolls with new applicants, more than the system could bear. They hoped that the resulting economic collapse would lead to political turmoil and socialism.
The National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO) used the Cloward-Piven strategy to produce the welfare crisis that bankrupted New York City in 1975.
Veterans of NWRO went on to found the Living Wage Movement and the Voting Rights Movement. Both use Cloward-Piven and are spear-headed by ACORN.
(M)Liberally Conservative: Cloward-Piven as it is being applied now to US politics.
Hospital Sues Mass MedicaidWhen the state won't pay, we raise prices on the sick.
- -
Boston Medical Center is suing Massachusetts for not paying $100 million if its bills. That expense increased the cost of everyone else’s health care.
Elaine Ullian is CEO of Boston Medical: We believe in health care reform, but it was never, ever supposed to be financed on the backs of the poor, as has happened in Massachusetts.
(M)More: Political Contributions required for Medicare Reimbursement in Illinois.
Personal Tour of Canadian Health CareIf you are tired of waiting, you can come back and wait tomorrow. Or pay at the private clinic.
- -
7/13/09 - PJTV (video 21m) by Steven Crowder
The wait times are cruel. A sick baby is sent home by one hospital after a quick look. Her parents try again at a 2nd one, and the baby needed a week of treatment.
That is what the world is like when you are a cost rather than a customer. When you want care under socialized medicine, you are a pure cost.
(M)More: Begging for Medical Care
Global Warming Best Predictions May Be WrongIt is sad when you can't predict the past.
- -
Gerald Dickens is Professor of Earth science at Rice University. "There appears to be something fundamentally wrong with the way climate models link temperature and carbon. They do not explain what appears in the geological record."
(v)Via Riehl World View
(M)More: Dispelling the Global Warming Myth
Federal Reserve FailuresThe government bankers will save us! They probably caused the problem in the first place.
- -
[edited] In about 1927, the Federal Reserve started buying large quantities of U.S. stocks on the open market. This produced an unprecedented stock bubble. The Fed only managed to reverse this in late 1929 by choking-off normal business credit.
The Fed stood by, pleading impotence during the following panic. The U.S. money stock lost one-third of its pre-crash value. This "great contraction" was the worst credit-crunch in U.S. history, producing the "national bank holiday" of March 6-12, 1933.
Regardless of this and later mismanagement, Congress rewards the Fed for its failures by giving it more powers.
(v)Via Cafe Hayek
Sotomayor Condones DiscriminationJudge Andrew Napolitano: [edited] When you elect a liberal Democrat as President, you get Sonia Sotomayor, a judicial nominee with strange ideas.
Like, if you take a test, and you pass the test and you’re supposed to get promoted, well, you won't get promoted because not enough people from another race passed the test. A lot of Americans will reject that attitude which she embraced.
(M)Sotomayor Snubs the Senate's Questions
07/28/09 - American Thinker by Rick Moran
She repeated her bizarrely brief opinion that the statue outlaws racially disparate voting qualifications: "A law disqualifying felons from voting constitutes a voting qualification."
Despair Among Business OwnersLet them drop their pretenses and join the workers.
- -
Business is down 10-20% or more. They have laid off staff or have 4-day weeks to keep staff. They see nothing that will benefit sales, cost reductions, or efficiency.
What is happening is an outrage. We will all be casualties of being controlled by bureaucrats and politicians who never, ever, ran a business or created a job. Job losses, cost increases, and inflation will get worse.
(v)Via Riehl World View
John Holdren is Obama's Science Czar.
Be afraidYou have to break some eggs to make a world omelette.
- -
In 1977 he proposed forced abortions, sterilizations through drinking water, babies seized from teen/single mothers, sterilization of undesirables, and a global government through an international police force. In writing. No kidding.
(v)Via Ed Driscoll
(M)More at OpenMarket
When Politicians Go Bad -- The Government We Don't DeserveHey, it's only money.
- -
California has spent all its money, and it is spending more. It's politicians think criticism is terrorism. Obama thinks CA is a model for us all. Bill Whittle at Pajamas Media. Video 5:30.
(v)Via Instapundit
See posts older than 07/06/09
Light-Up Link SearchLocate links containing search words. The links light up.
PostsMy Blog Posts
LinksLinks to posts, with summaries
ArchiveList of post titles by date
LabelsFind posts by keyword
QuipsQuotes, Jokes, Videos, Computer games
BlogsBlogs I read
Amazing, Quips, Videos
A Future of GlassBig displays everywhere.
WingsuitBicycling (below) through obstacles and jumps may leave you nervous. Try these relaxing images of jumping off a mountain in a wingsuit. The idea is to fly close without touching the rocks and trees. (M)Jeb Corliss "Grinds the Crack" flying through mountain valleys in his wingsuit
Unicycle FreerideDaily Pundit - Kris Holm on a unicycle freerides through the woods.
WRC RacingDaily Pundit - Video 3:37 - [edited] "There is no motorsport quite like WRC racing. Strap a Scandinavian maniac to a four-wheel-drive turbocharged rocket, then sideways down a mountainside through a meat tunnel of drunken, cheering Finnish spectators, whereupon he explodes". "http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FetBYgKCwQI"
Danny Hart Downhill01/18/12 - Dr. John
Danny Hart cycles downhill very fast on a twisty path. What is the average survival in this sport? Video 3 min.
"http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=EqYgAX6D43Q"
Diving DeepDave Shaw twice dived 886 feet to the bottom of the world's biggest underwater cave in South Africa. He used SCUBA re-breather equipment and a backup team. Anything deeper than 200 feet is serious business. The second dive went bad. (M)Wikipedia provides details about deep diving.
Powers of 10
Physicist Phillip Morrison (1916-2005) narrates this 1977 (9:01) exploration of the universe.
The view of a man at a picnic starts at 1 meter, expanding to 10 meters, 100 meters, and so on, by powers of 10 each 10 seconds until at 1024 meters we view a dark and empty 100 million light year section of the universe.
Zoom back to 1 meter in 48 seconds, then descend into microscopic space, 10 times smaller each 10 seconds, landing inside a proton at 10-16 meters.
(M)04/25/05 - MIT News - About Phillip Morrison's life
Quicker Than the EyeJuggling and magic. He is sitting behind a table, but is still amazing. (4:33)
BBC - Flying PenguinsApril Fools 2008 - Flying Penguins (1:30) by the British Broadcasting Company. The BBC has a history of producing realistic April Fools videos. (M)The making of Flying Penguins (2:56)
BBC - Swiss Spaghetti HarvestApril Fools 1957 - The Swiss Spaghetti Harvest (2:32) by the British Broadcasting Company.
Many people called and wrote for locations in Switzerland to see the harvest, and how to obtain and cook the special "fresh" pasta.
(M)The story behind Spaghetti Harvest
Join us. No pressure.10/01/2010 YouTube 3:59. A real ad by 1010Global suggests cutting carbon emissions by 10%.
School children, employees, and athletes are asked to join in. It is all voluntary. No pressure. The non-participants are immediately blown up.
It's all in good fun, if your idea of fun is a fantasy about blowing up the people who disagree with you, and then making a video to share the laughs. I suppose the blood flying everywhere is part of the humor.
(M)10/16/10 - Marquette Warrior.
An analysis and criticism of the video.
Tiananmen in MAWikipedia - The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989
University students gathered in Tiananmen Square to mourn the liberal reformer Hu. They voiced grievances against inflation, limited career prospects, and corruption of the party elite. They called for government accountability, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and the restoration of workers' control over industry. At one point, about a million people assembled in the Square.
(M)01/19/13 - Rally at the Massachusetts State House (YouTube 7:54)
The speaker Rob is a naturalized US citizen from China. He protested the tyranny of the Chinese government at Tiananmen Square in 1989. That peaceful protest was stopped by the AK-47 rifles of the Chinese Government. The Chinese people had no bargaining power because they had no guns. This continues to the present.
Rob: "When government has all the guns, it has all the rights."
Sheldon Richman10/16/13 - The Future of Freedom Foundation: [edited] People untrained in the economic way of thinking do not link bad consequences to bad decisions by politicians. An unemployed, unskilled worker may not see that the minimum wage law is responsible for pricing him out of a job. If you want to work for yourself, you may not understand that politicians have placed a dozen tollgates in your way as a favor to special interests.
Political DiscussionAMG, inspired by an old trial lawyers’ saying: When the facts are on your side, pound the facts. When the law is on your side, pound the law. When neither is on your side, pound the table.: Quote statistics that support you. Bad statistics? Give an emotional case. Neither one? Create some statistics. Stuck? Make up an emotional story.
Isaac Asimov12/22/12 - Quando by Billy Hollis [edited]
Why would an author be incomprehensible?
• He may be unable to explain himself clearly.
• He may not know what he’s talking about.
• He may be trying to confuse the issue.
AMG: Great minds explain clearly. The brilliant but confused professor is a movie myth. That leaves the last two explanations, ignorance or lies.: I don’t assume I’m stupid when I read something I don’t understand.
(bio)
Isaac Asimov (1920-1992). Science fiction writer and popularizer of science, author of "I, Robot", and the Foundation Series, among many others.
T.S. EliotThomas Stearns Eliot was an American-born English poet, dramatist, and literary critic (1888–1965).: Half of the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don't mean to do harm, but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves.
Andrew CarnegieAndrew Carnegie (1835-1919) was the son of a handloom weaver in Scotland. He immigrated to the US as a child with his family. His family valued reading and learning. He built Carnegie Steel, sold it in 1901, and used his vast fortune for philanthropy. He established Carnegie-Mellon University and 2,800 libraries in the US.: Men have wasted their precious years, trying to extract education from an ignorant past whose chief province is to teach us, not what to adopt, but what to avoid. Men have sent their sons to colleges to waste their energies upon obtaining a knowledge of such languages as Greek and Latin, which are of no more practical use to them than Choctaw.
They have been crammed with the details of petty and insignificant skirmishes between savages, and taught to exalt a band of ruffians into heroes, and we have called them "educated", as if they were destined for life upon some other planet. This has imbued them with false ideas and a distaste for practical life.
Had they instead gone into active work, they would have been better educated in every true sense. The fire and energy have been stamped out of them. Their chief question is how to live a life of idleness, not of usefulness.
(v)Via Econlog
Bryan CaplanBryan Caplan is Professor of Economics at George Mason University. [edited] Educational success signals good things to employers. A good student tends to be smart, hard-working, and conformist, and probably a good worker. What he learned how to do is a mere detail. Employers expect that a good student will quickly learn on the job what he needs to know.
Education is not magic. Professors can't make students better at their careers with learned lectures on arcane topics. Society would be better off if taxpayers saved their money, students spent fewer years in school, and sheltered academics like me finally entered the Real World and found a real job.
Karol SheininA proud Russian immigrant to the US.: [edited] Many Soviet Jews immigrated to America around 1977. Soviet propaganda tried limiting this with a rumor that life in America is so terrible that the old people eat cat food. People didn’t quite get it. They have food specifically made for cats? What a country!
Robin Hanson10/10/09 - "Denying Dominance". Mr. Hanson is an Associate Professor of Economics at George Mason University.: [edited] Humans attend closely to status, an important part of status is dominance, and we show dominance when we tell others what to do. Telling someone else what to do affirms status.
We do not notice most of our status moves, and we attribute them to other motives. When possible, we claim the most admired of motives, altruism. We think we are directing others in order to help them, not to dominate them.
Don BoudreauxProfessor of Economics at George Mason University: [edited]
Academics and Hollywood celebrities cling with remarkably steadfast faith to a political fantasy. They believe that concentrating authority and responsibility in the state ensures that decisions are made better, more wisely, more "scientifically", and in ways likely to promote greater human flourishing.
This is the most absurd, dangerous, and widespread fantasy that afflicts humanity.
H.L.MenckenUS newspaper editor 1880 - 1956.: Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.
[edited]
The trouble QuotationsPage with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. Oppressive laws are first aimed at them, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all.
Ed KochMr. Koch replied after he was defeated in 1989 for re-election as Mayor of New York.
Nov 2012 - This link to AEI-Ideas suggests how the re-election of Barack Obama will punish the people this time.: (Q) Will you run again for public office?) (A) "No, the people have spoken, and they must be punished."
Frank ChodorovAt Cafe Hayek from Chodorov's book Fugitive Essays. [edited]: Perhaps an inner need impels the socialist to his ideology. Every advocate of government intervention whom I have met has a plan for others, and he is certain that it will produce the intended results. He is always fanatic. If you disagree with him, it is not merely your error; it is because you are sinful.
(M)08/2008 - EO: Leading the People
If You Don't Agree Now, You Will Later
Bryan CaplanBrian Caplan is an economist writing at EconLog.
From Tolstoy's novel Anna Karenina [edited]:
Vronsky's life was particularly happy in that he had a code of principles which defined with unfailing certitude what he should and should not do. This code covered only a very small circle of contingencies, but Vronsky never went outside that circle. One may lie to a woman, but never to a man, and so on.
These principles were possibly not reasonable or good, but they were certain. So long as he adhered to them, Vronsky was at peace, and he could hold his head up. [edited]: National egoists are one example of what could be called Vronsky Syndrome.
They swallow conventional morality whole without looking for inconsistencies, and they see you as clueless if you point out their inconsistencies. So, they rarely wonder if they are wrong, and they habitually embrace popular evils, guilt-free.
Robert FrostPulitzer Prize American poet of rural life and colloquial speech, 1864-1973.: A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel.
Andrew BreitbartAndrew Breitbart (1969-2012) spoke on 2/10/12 to the Conservative Political Action Conference about supporting conservatie politics, video 16:06.: The truth isn't mean. It's just the truth.
Jerry Della Femina (1936-) From his book about advertizing, From Those Wonderful Folks Who Gave You Pearl Harbor.: A great deal of advertising is better than the product. When that happens, all that the good advertising will do is put you out of business faster. (M)Biography at Wikipedia
President Lyndon B. Johnson "LBJ"Promoter of "The Great Society". Served 1963–1969. [edited]: "No longer will young families see their own incomes and hopes eaten away simply because they are carrying out their deep moral obligations to their parents, uncles, and aunts."
David HendersonHenderson: Social Security and Medicare are a huge wealth transfer from the young to the old. Generation X and younger are the ones who will really pay through the nose.: In other words, unless there is an Easter Bunny, LBJ said "we will free you of your moral obligations by obligating strangers".
Bryan CaplanProfessor of Economics at George Mason University (to the very liberal Paul Krugman, edited): You are forgiving of people with irresponsible lifestyles, and outraged at people who don't want to pay taxes to help those people.
This seems morally perverse. If you are going to condemn someone, it should be the person who behaves irresponsibly in the first place, not the complete stranger who asks, "How is this my fault?"
Adolf HitlerHitler: [edited] There is always a certain credibility in the big lie. The broad masses of a nation have simple, primitive minds. They more readily believe the big lie than the small lie. They often tell small lies in little matters, but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they do not believe that others would have the impudence to do so. You may bring the facts which prove the lie clearly to their minds. They will still doubt and waver, and they will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.: The more monstrous the conspiracy, the less likely it will be uncovered.
George OrwellGeorge Orwell (Eric Blair 1903-1950) is famous for his book 1984 about a totalitarian dystopia.: During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.
(M)Conservapedia: A brief biography of Orwell
Yogi BerraAbout his baseball career.: In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. (M)More memorable lines by Berra at Brainy Quote
Jonah GoldbergColumnist at Hot Air.: [edited] If I say we need one hundred feet of bridge to cross a one hundred foot chasm, that makes me an extremist. Somebody else says we don’t need to cross the chasm in the first place. That makes him an extremist.
The third guy is the centrist because he insists that we compromise by building a fifty foot bridge that ends in mid-air.
As an extremist, I’ll tell you that the other extremist has a much better grasp on reality than the centrist. We extremists have a serious disagreement about what to do. The independent has no idea what to do and doesn’t want to bother with figuring it out.
Roger L SimonScreenwritier, author, former liberal, and founder of Pajamas Media.: The American public can only be pushed so far. That may account for the greatness of our country, what is referred to as American exceptionalism. We may be fools, but we have our limits.
Joseph Sobran: Joseph Sobran (1946–2010) was senior editor of National Review for 18 years, a writer, and syndicated columnist.
DemocracySobran's website and writings has proved only that the best way to gain power over people is to assure the people that they are ruling themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully submissive slaves.
PoliticiansJoseph Sobran quotes never accuse you of greed for wanting other people's money, only for wanting to keep your own money.
(v)Daily Pundit
Harold DemsetzEconomist: The only real alternative to the marketplace is an institution that can use a greater measure of coercion than is available to participants in the marketplace.
Floyd Ferris,Ferris: Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed? We want them broken. You’d better get it straight that it’s not a bunch of boy scouts you’re up against.
One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone?
But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted and you create a nation of law-breakers.
-- --
Introductory quote for "The Cowing of the Medical Profession" by Dr. Richard N. Fogoros, at The Covert Rationing Blog
bureaucrat in Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand: "The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them."
Walter LippmanWalter Lippmann (1889-1974) wrote books on political thought and was a distinguished syndicated columnist.: The people longed for kings who were philosophers. And so the men who wished to be kings declared that they were philosophers.
Glenn Reynolds - "The Blogfather" :
1st LawIf people don’t need to defer gratification and work hard in order to achieve the status they desire, they will be less inclined to do those things. The greater the government subsidy, the greater the effect, and the more net harm produced.: Subsidizing the markers of status does not produce the character traits that result in that status; it undermines them.
John DeweyLiberquo - A collection of quotes about liberty was a social planner in education and a founder of our modern public schools:
• "Independent self-reliant people would be a counterproductive anachronism in the collective society of the future where people will be defined by their associations (1896)."
• "The children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society that is coming, where everyone would be interdependent (1899)."
(v)Daily Pundit - Words of Goat Wisdom
President Ronald ReaganAt BrainyQuote: Government's view of the economy could be summed up: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Rudi Dornbusch: EconLog by Arnold Kling about the effects of government intervention in the European debt crisis. In economics, things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Larry ReedQuoted by Don Boudreaux at Cafe Hayek. He adds: Lots of broken eggs, brutally smashed. That’s all. How glorious. about Stalinist Russia: Even if it’s true, that you can’t make an omelette without breaking a few eggs, where’s the omelette?
Edmund Burke: Edmund Burke was an Irish statesman and writer in the 1700's. Henry Miller provides this quote at The Hoover Institute, in an article about how our government is following public opinion rather than forming it according to scientific knowledge.Your Representative owes you not only his industry, but his judgment, and he betrays instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.
Democrats accuse Republicans of being misguided, biased, racist, stupid, selfish, heartless, dishonest, corrupt, and evil. Then, they search for any Republican they can find or manufacture to publicly support their plans.
Economic Theory vs PracticeThe beginning of the scientific method in economics (cartoon) (v)Via Daniel J Mitchell
Milton FriedmanFree market economist 1912-2006. visited a massive government project in Asia. Thousands of workers using shovels were building a canal. Friedman asked why there was no powered earth-moving equipment? An official replied that using shovels created more jobs. Friedman quipped, “Then why not use spoons instead of shovels?”
Ayn RandFamous author of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead, and proponent of Objectivism. 1905-1982.: In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit. In that transfusion of blood which drains the good to feed the evil, the compromiser is the transmitting rubber tube.
In Nigeria you vote and then die in the ensuing violence. In Chicago you die in random violence and then you vote. (v)Comment by Ignatz at JustOneMinute
Alisa: A new drink The bin Laden: two shots and a splash of water.
Henry HazlittEasy Opinions → Henry Hazlitt (1946)
Economics in One Lesson
[edited] Economics is haunted by more fallacies than any other subject. This is no accident. The difficulties of the subject are multiplied a thousandfold by the pleadings of selfish interests.
A group may benefit greatly from certain policies. It will hire the best buyable minds to argue plausibly and persistently for them. It will either convince the public or so befuddle the argument that clear thinking becomes next to impossible.
Ross McKitrickCanadian environmental economist about Earth Hour: People who see virtue in doing without electricity should shut off their fridge, stove, microwave, computer, water heater, lights, TV and all other appliances for a month, not an hour. (v)Via Samizdata (M)Comedian George Carlin: Saving the Planet - "Why are we here? Maybe to make plastic". See the link.
President George Washington(1732-1799) First President of the United States.
• Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.
• FirearmsBrainyQuote are second only to the Constitution in importance. They are the teeth of the people's liberty.
A popular sayingWellington's comment at Legal Insurrection.
Also: A man knew about my flight from Communist totalitarianism. He asked me, “Why did you pick liberal Boulder, Colorado of all places to live?” “So I won’t forget,” I answered impertinently. in Prague under Communism: Don't think. If you think, don't say it. If you say it, don't write it. If you write it, don't sign it. If you sign it, don't complain.
Ann AlthouseProfessor of constitutional law [edited]: In a world where we depend on what "is" means, the government merely needs to interpret. Regulating interstate commerce includes forcing people to buy things they don't want to buy, and smoking includes not smoking.
You can make anything you want to be true, if you only believe. And, the government can make anything it wants to be true, if it only dictates.
40smith: I've spent a small fortune on guns, ammo, golf, wine and women. The rest I just squandered. (v)Via Eternity Road
TSA Security ChainA picture reminds us of the Transportation Security Agency (v)Via Bruce Schneier
From the Soviet UnionAt Protein Wisdom: The future is known, it is the past that keeps changing.
C.S. LewisNovelist, poet, academic, medievalist, literary critic, essayist, lay theologian, and Christian proponent. 1898-1963.: Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.
The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Will RogersFolksy comedian. 1879-1935.: The thing about my jokes is that they don't hurt anybody. You can say they're not funny, or they're terrible, or they're good, or whatever it is, but they don't do no harm.
But with Congress, every time they make a joke, it's a law. And every time they make a law, it's a joke.
Ann CoulterCoulter: When they’re running for office, all Democrats claim to support tax cuts (for the middle class), to support gun rights (for hunters), and to “personally oppose” abortion. Then, they get into office and vote to raise taxes, ban guns, and allow abortions if a girl can’t fit into her prom dress.
The common wisdom holds that “both parties” have to appeal to the extremes during the primary and then move to the center for the general election. To the contrary, both parties run for office as conservatives. Once they have fooled the voters and are safely in office, Republicans sometimes double-cross the voters. Democrats always do.: Moving to the center.
(v)via Ed Driscoll
Art CardenAssistant Professor of Economics and Research Fellow with the Independent Institute.: When the incentives are right, good things happen despite bad people. When the incentives are wrong, bad things happen despite good people.
Progressives: When your intentions are selfish, you can't do anything good. When your intentions are charitable, you can't do anything bad.
Don BoudreauxProfessor of Economics at George Mason University: To the Progressive brain, I am smart and kind if I am enchanted by half-baked schemes to prod, herd, and tax my fellow Americans, but I am dumb and mean if I question the wisdom of all such collectivist plots.
Extreme PumpkinsSculptor Ray Villafane carves amazing, creepy pumpkin faces. Gallery (M)More punpkin faces by Villafane (M)Villafane carves on the Martha Stuart show. Videos 7:44, 4:14
H.L. MenckenMencken quotes at Mises.org: [edited]
Every election is a sort of advance auction of stolen goods.
All government is essentially organized exploitation, and almost always is the implacable enemy of every industrious man.
A professional politician is a professionally dishonorable man. To get anywhere near high office he makes so many compromises and submits to so many humiliations that he becomes indistinguishable from a streetwalker.
EveryMentioned by Don Boudreaux at Cafe Hayek decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under.
EducationAt The Classic Liberal is a form of propaganda, a deliberate scheme to outfit the pupil with a simple appetite for gulping ideas ready-made, not with the capacity to weigh ideas. It aims to make 'good' citizens, which is to say docile and uninquisitive citizens.
George SmathersFrom the Washington Post 1/20/07 attacked his Senate opponent in 1950. "Do you know that Claude Pepper is known all over Washington as a shameless extrovert? Not only that, but this man is reliably reported to practice nepotism with his sister-in-law, and he has a sister who was once a thespian in wicked New York. Worst of all, it is an established fact that Mr. Pepper, before his marriage, habitually practiced celibacy." (v)Via PowerLine
Dr. Thomas SowellSenior Fellow at the Hoover Institute, Stanford, CA. Conservative libertarian economist, social theorist, and political philosopher. [edited]: A community organizer isn’t a friendly local expert giving advice on better living. He mobilizes resentment, to put the public into battle on behalf of third party interests. (Video 36:42)
(M)Biography and columns at Town Hall
(Q)Quotes
(Q)Quotes
• In politics, you can say all sorts of things that have no relationship with reality.
• No matter how disastrously some policy has turned out, anyone who criticizes it can expect to hear: "But what would you replace it with?" When you put out a fire, what do you replace it with?
•
The more I study12/25/12 - Townhall - Liberals Are By No Means Liberal the history of intellectuals, the more they seem like a wrecking crew, dismantling civilization bit by bit, replacing what works with what sounds good.
Charles KrauthammerPulitzer-Prize columnist: To understand the workings of American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. (M)Short biography. (v)Via Ed Driscoll
Robert Heinlein wrote "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress". He suggested a two chamber legislature. One chamber would enact laws, but only by a two-thirds majority. Anything that had one-third opposition would be deemed to be highly flawed.
The other chamber would repeal any laws that had one-third opposition, under the same rationale as in the first chamber.
(v)Comment by Saba Hillel at AdviceGoddess.com
Winston Churchill1874-1965. British Prime Minister during World War II, credited with directing and inspiring Britain to victory.: If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival.
There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.
We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.
(v)At EnoughRoom
Henry Morgenthau Jr. was FDR's Treasury Secretary in 1939: "We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work. I say, after eight years of this administration, we have just as much unemployment as when we started, and an enormous debt to boot!"
(v)Via Collecting My Thoughts
(M)EO: Stimulus Does Not Cure a Recession
Jobs change when people change what they want to buy or can afford. It is possible to keep people at their low-value or unneeded jobs for a bit longer, only by wasting the savings that should be financing a real recovery.
Three prisoners in a U.S. jail.
One: I charged higher prices than my competitors. I'm in for exploiting consumers, profiteering, and monopoly.
Two: I charged lower prices. I'm in for predatory pricing and cutthroat competition.
Three: I charged the same prices. I'm in for collusion, price fixing, and cartelization.
(v)Via Reason.com. A few economic jokes from Russia and the United States
Ludwig von Mises:05/21/10 - Mises.org: Deficit Financing and Inflation. From lectures by economist Ludwig von Mises, compiled by Bettina Bien Greaves.
"The thing is that the individual cannot do anything that makes the inflationary machine and mechanism work. This is done by the government. The government makes the inflation. And if the government complains about the fact that prices are going up and appoints committees of learned men to fight against the inflation, we have only to say, 'Nobody other than you, the government, brings about inflation, you know.' "
[edited] Inflation is the increase in the quantity of money, "printing money". Here is proof that this is destructive. A government produces inflation, but loudly and repeatedly denies that it is responsible. It says "inflation occurs because people ask for higher prices. We don't know why prices are going up. Bad people are making the prices go up, not the government!"
George Bernard Shaw telegrammed Winston Churchill just prior to the opening of Shaw's play Major Barbara: "Have reserved two tickets for first night. Come and bring a friend if you have one." Churchill wired back: "Impossible to come to first night. Will come to second night, if you have one."
(v)Via BizBag
Tom Maquire: 04/30/10 - Tom Maguire at JustOneMinute, about the average performance of ethnic groups on standardized intelligence tests. I wonder why the white geniuses that invented these culturally biased tests for intelligence couldn't rig them so that whites would out-score Asians. I bet if Asians had designed these tests they would have been able to rig them properly.
Arthur C. Clarke: Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Porter Clark: Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.
(v)From a comment by Mike Borgelt at Samizdata
The pretzel lady was a part of city life. Small and quite old, she sat quietly behind a small table displaying a large plate of soft pretzels. The businessman usually left 50 cents in support, without talking or taking a pretzel.
After his usual contribution one afternoon, the lady spoke up "Pretzels are now 75 cents".
Frédéric Bastiat: Renowned writer in economics 1801-1850.Socialism confuses the distinction between government and society. Every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. (v)Via "Advice Goddess" Amy Alkon
Bob Owens:
04/17/10 - Bob Owens at PJTV
Fred: Can a black person be racist?
Liberal: Only if he is a Republican.
[edited] Why do white urban liberals presume to judge the “authenticity” of someone’s race? The same defect blinds them to the fact that assigning an ideology to skin color is itself racism of the first order.
ObamaCare: We will lose money on every patient, but we expect to make it up on volume by insuring everyone.
Sam Donaldson: In this recession, you have blamed past mistakes and Congress. Does any blame belong to you?
President Reagan: Yes, because for many years I was a Democrat.
(M)Video 0:21
(v)Via Don Surber
All budget savings are based on this old joke.
The boy ran into the house and said exitedly, "Dad, I saved a dollar today by running home behind the bus." The gruff father gave him the back of his hand. "Stupid child, you could have saved five dollars by running home behind a cab."
Groucho MarxCommedian, movie and TV star, noted for his quick wit and the Marx Brothers. 1890-1977.: Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies.
Karl Marx revealed that business owners are leeches on society, draining away the wealth that rightfully belongs to the workers. At least, the wealth of the workers who have jobs. The unemployed remain unexploited. Are they grateful?
Bertrand Russell: The stupid are cocksure, and the intelligent are full of doubt.
• Most people would rather die than think. In fact, they do so.
(M)The Solution Is Simple - Dunning-Kruger Effect
Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own skills, and thay fail to recognize genuine skill in others.
If you can keep your head, while others around you are losing theirs, you may not understand the real situation.
Government is more predictable and valued than Business. Businesses sometimes make promises they don't keep, surprising and angering their paying customers. Government makes promises that it almost never keeps. This doesn't surprise anyone, who are still happy for whatever free help they receive.
Football and the Existential Coin Toss09/2009 The Onion - Video 2:32 (v)Via Ed Driscoll
Government is the ideal director of medicine. Politicians are thoughtful, caring, and altruistic. They devote their lives to helping others. Contrast this to Physicians, who spend half their lives learning diagnosis and complex, delicate procedures, with the intent of charging sick people for these services.
Those tea party people are fanatics. They even make their own signs.
From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs, unless he needs a lot of healthcare.
P.J. O'Rourke: "The beauty of our system is not that we can elect the smartest person to office, but any nit wit we want to." This has been a strength of the American system for 100+ years.
Earth Is Not Endangered - We Are Why are we here? Maybe, to make plastic
- -
Comedian George Carlin considers the future of Humankind and the Earth. He gives Earth the odds. Video 7:39. Plastic begins at 5:00.
(M)Transcript of the video. Search for "after we're gone"
(M)Quotes by the late commedian George Carlin
Duck, Bar, NailsA duck walks into a bar ...
Obama's administration promises to unite White and Black, Left and Right, rich and poor, and True and False.
"If you give a man a fish, he eats for a day.
If you teach him how to fish, he eats forever."
Can anyone in the Department teach fishing?
Oh well, nevermind.
It doesn't much matter what you believe so long as you are not sincere.
What do you order at Obama's restaurant? "Oh, just bring me something different."
What is on the menu? "We're changing the menu, we hope to tell you later."
"I'll have the special, Duck a l'Orange with Potatoes au Gratin for $.99". "Sorry, the special has been changed to a hot dog and chips for $20.99. We'll bring you that. Most of that goes to help the poor. There is no need to pay now, we have your credit card number."
How many people are needed to screw in a lightbulb? About 1000, according to Obama's stimulus plan.
Reference
Brain BiasesA collection of biases in thinking. How your brain may be misleading you.
Optical IllusionsA collection of optical illusions. Just what are our brains doing?
(M)Ten printed optical illusions. I like the shadowed checker board.
(M)More illusions. The green and red spiral is amazing, they are actually the same color.
(M)Two Minutes: Ten Illusions - video. A sprint among 10 illusion displays. You will play this three times.
The Devil's DictionaryAmbrose Bierce (1842-1913) compiled these sardonic definitions about human nature. See "Idiot" as a start.
(M)Wikipedia:
Ambrose Bierce
Slogans
No legislation without explanation.
Our politicans stand proud and shout "Un-American" to the people asking questions. All we can do is whisper "un-elected" to the politicians.
Posts
No comments :
Post a Comment
You can use the HTML tags <b> <i> and <a href="">, but not <p> or <blockquote>. Trouble commenting? Email your comment or problem to Commerce-Try at Comcast.net. Leave out the minus sign. Mention the name of the post in the email.